Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission, Complications, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Overview

Journal JAMA Netw Open

Publisher American Medical Association

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2024 Jun 18

PMID 38888922

Authors

Khara M Sauro

Christine Smith

Seremi Ibadin

Abigail Thomas

Heather Ganshorn

Linda Bakunda

Bishnu Bajgain

Steven P Bisch

Gregg Nelson

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Importance: A comprehensive review of the evidence exploring the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines has not been completed.

Objective: To evaluate if ERAS guidelines are associated with improved hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, complications, and mortality compared with usual surgical care, and to understand differences in estimates based on study and patient factors.

Data Sources: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until June 2021.

Study Selection: Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that examined ERAS-guided surgery compared with a control group and reported on at least 1 of the outcomes.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates for each outcome, and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity within each outcome.

Main Outcome And Measures: The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital readmission within 30 days of index discharge, 30-day postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality.

Results: Of the 12 047 references identified, 1493 full texts were screened for eligibility, 495 were included in the systematic review, and 74 RCTs with 9076 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies presented data from 21 countries and 9 ERAS-guided surgical procedures with 15 (20.3%) having a low risk of bias. The mean (SD) Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research checklist score was 13.5 (2.3). Hospital length of stay decreased by 1.88 days (95% CI, 0.95-2.81 days; I2 = 86.5%; P < .001) and the risk of complications decreased (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; I2 = 78.6%; P < .001) in the ERAS group. Risk of readmission and mortality were not significant.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this meta-analysis, ERAS guidelines were associated with decreased hospital length of stay and complications. Future studies should aim to improve implementation of ERAS and increase the reach of the guidelines.

Citing Articles

Effect of the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing elective craniotomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Choudhary S, Bijarniya D, Jat S, Agrawal M, Vasudeva S Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):291.

PMID: 40063290 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03446-9.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Compliance and Outcomes for Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery.

Wagoner C, Thomas A, Dort J, Nelson G, Sauro K JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025; .

PMID: 40014312 PMC: 11869090. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2024.5393.

Impact of "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery" (ERAS) protocols vs. traditional perioperative care on patient outcomes after colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

Kannan V, Ullah N, Geddada S, Ibrahiam A, Munaf Shakir Al-Qassab Z, Ahmed O Patient Saf Surg. 2025; 19(1):4.

PMID: 39819478 PMC: 11737126. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-024-00425-9.

Nurse-led Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: Potential Solution to Shorten Postoperative Recovery.

Tyagi N Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025; 29(1):3-5.

PMID: 39802254 PMC: 11719544. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24883.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for minimally invasive treatment of Achilles tendon rupture: Prospective single-center randomized study.

Yan X, Zhang W World J Orthop. 2025; 15(12):1191-1199.

PMID: 39744729 PMC: 11686527. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i12.1191.

References

Kapritsou M, Papathanassoglou E, Konstantinou E, Korkolis D, Mpouzika M, Kaklamanos I . Effects of the Enhanced Recovery Program on the Recovery and Stress Response in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2020; 43(2):146-155. DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000417. View

Puccetti F, Wijnhoven B, Kuppusamy M, Hubka M, Low D . Impact of standardized clinical pathways on esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2021; 35(2). DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab027. View

Qu L, Liu B, Zhang H, Sankey E, Chai W, Wang B . Management of Postoperative Pain after Elective Craniotomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of a Neurosurgical Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program. Int J Med Sci. 2020; 17(11):1541-1549. PMC: 7359387. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.46403. View

Kang S, Lee Y, Min S, Park Y, Ahn S, Park D . Multimodal Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program is the Optimal Perioperative Care in Patients Undergoing Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(11):3231-3238. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6625-0. View

Bansal D, Nayak B, Singh P, Nayyar R, Ramachandran R, Kumar R . Randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes with and without the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Indian J Urol. 2020; 36(2):95-100. PMC: 7279092. DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_11_20. View

Zegers M, de Bruijne M, de Keizer B, Merten H, Groenewegen P, van der Wal G . The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies. Patient Saf Surg. 2011; 5:13. PMC: 3127749. DOI: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-13. View

Twomey R, Wayne Matthews T, Nakoneshny S, Schrag C, Chandarana S, Matthews J . From Pathways to Practice: Impact of Implementing Mobilization Recommendations in Head and Neck Cancer Surgery with Free Flap Reconstruction. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(12). PMC: 8228478. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122890. View

Nelson G, Kiyang L, Crumley E, Chuck A, Nguyen T, Faris P . Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Across a Provincial Healthcare System: The ERAS Alberta Colorectal Surgery Experience. World J Surg. 2016; 40(5):1092-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3472-7. View

Scioscia M, Ceccaroni M, Gentile I, Rossini R, Clarizia R, Brunelli D . Randomized Trial on Fast Track Care in Colorectal Surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017; 24(5):815-821. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.04.004. View

10.

Serclova Z, Dytrych P, Marvan J, Nova K, Hankeova Z, Ryska O . Fast-track in open intestinal surgery: prospective randomized study (Clinical Trials Gov Identifier no. NCT00123456). Clin Nutr. 2009; 28(6):618-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2009.05.009. View

11.

Jones C, Morrison B, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, Scott M, Cecconi Ebm C . Hospital Costs and Long-term Survival of Patients Enrolled in an Enhanced Recovery Program for Open Liver Resection: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Perioper Med. 2021; 4(1):e16829. PMC: 7884210. DOI: 10.2196/16829. View

12.

Peng J, Dong R, Jiao J, Liu M, Zhang X, Bu H . Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Impact on the Systemic Inflammatory Response of Patients Following Gynecological Oncology Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study. Cancer Manag Res. 2021; 13:4383-4392. PMC: 8179735. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S294718. View

13.

Brennan T, Leape L, Laird N, Hebert L, Localio A, Lawthers A . Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(6):370-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199102073240604. View

14.

Kapritsou M, Korkolis D, Giannakopoulou M, Kaklamanos I, Konstantinou M, Katsoulas T . Fast-Track Recovery Program After Major Liver Resection: A Randomized Prospective Study. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2018; 41(2):104-110. DOI: 10.1097/SGA.0000000000000306. View

15.

Elias K, Stone A, McGinigle K, Tankou J, Scott M, Fawcett W . The Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research (RECOvER) Checklist: A Joint Statement by the ERAS and ERAS USA Societies. World J Surg. 2018; 43(1):1-8. PMC: 6313353. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4753-0. View

16.

Akhtar M, Khan N, Qayyum A, Khan S . Cost difference of enhanced recovery after surgery pathway vs. Conventional care In Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020; 32(4):470-475. View

17.

Yilmaz G, Akca A, Kiyak H, Salihoglu Z . Comparison of enhanced recovery protocol with conventional care in patients undergoing minor gynecologic surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020; 15(1):220-226. PMC: 7020716. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.85464. View

18.

Ahmed O, Rogers A, Bolger J, Mastrosimone A, Robb W . Meta-Analysis of Enhanced Recovery Protocols in Bariatric Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 22(6):964-972. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3709-x. View

19.

Mari G, Costanzi A, Crippa J, Falbo R, Miranda A, Rossi M . Surgical Stress Reduction in Elderly Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery within an ERAS Protocol. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017; 111(6):476-480. DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.111.6.476. View

20.

Ruiz-Tovar J, Garcia A, Ferrigni C, Gonzalez J, Castellon C, Duran M . Impact of implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019; 15(2):228-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.11.002. View