» Articles » PMID: 38883969

High-Dimensional Fixed Effects Profiling Models and Applications in End-Stage Kidney Disease Patients: Current State and Future Directions

Overview
Date 2024 Jun 17
PMID 38883969
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Profiling analysis aims to evaluate health care providers, including hospitals, nursing homes, or dialysis facilities among others with respect to a patient outcome, such as 30-day unplanned hospital readmission or mortality. Fixed effects (FE) profiling models have been developed over the last decade, motivated by the overall need to (a) improve accurate identification or "flagging" of under-performing providers, (b) relax assumptions inherent in random effects (RE) profiling models, and (c) take into consideration the unique disease characteristics and care/treatment processes of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on dialysis. In this paper, we review the current state of FE methodologies and their rationale in the ESKD population and illustrate applications in four key areas: profiling dialysis facilities for (1) patient hospitalizations over time (longitudinally) using standardized dynamic readmission ratio (SDRR), (2) identification of dialysis facility characteristics (e.g., staffing level) that contribute to hospital readmission, and (3) adverse recurrent events using standardized event ratio (SER). Also, we examine the operating characteristics with a focus on FE profiling models. Throughout these areas of applications to the ESKD population, we identify challenges for future research in both methodology and clinical studies.

References
1.
Estes J, Senturk D, Kurum E, Rhee C, Nguyen D . Fixed Effects High-Dimensional Profiling Models in Low Information Context. Int J Stat Med Res. 2022; 10:118-131. PMC: 9033160. DOI: 10.6000/1929-6029.2021.10.11. View

2.
Krumholz H, Lin Z, Drye E, Desai M, Han L, Rapp M . An administrative claims measure suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day all-cause readmission rates among patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011; 4(2):243-52. PMC: 3350811. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957498. View

3.
Silber J, Satopaa V, Mukherjee N, Rockova V, Wang W, Hill A . Improving Medicare's Hospital Compare Mortality Model. Health Serv Res. 2016; 51 Suppl 2:1229-47. PMC: 4874942. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12478. View

4.
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kovesdy C, Streja E, Rhee C, Soohoo M, Chen J . Transition of care from pre-dialysis prelude to renal replacement therapy: the blueprints of emerging research in advanced chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017; 32(suppl_2):ii91-ii98. PMC: 5837675. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfw357. View

5.
Heinze G, Schemper M . A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat Med. 2002; 21(16):2409-19. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1047. View