» Articles » PMID: 38883677

Comparison of Cardiorespiratory Parameters Between 6-minute Walk Test and 1-minute Sit to Stand Test in Young Adults with Post-COVID-19: Follow-up 3 Months

Overview
Journal J Thorac Dis
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2024 Jun 17
PMID 38883677
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The investigation of cardiorespiratory fitness in young adults post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is interesting because this information may help in understanding cardiorespiratory function in these populations. Moreover, it helps to know that these impairments possibly interfere with study, learning, and the activities of daily life in young adults post-COVID-19. This study aims to investigate and compare the cardiorespiratory parameters between 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and 1-minute sit-to-stand test (1-min-STST) in healthy young adults and post-COVID-19 and at a 3-month follow-up.

Methods: Forty-six young adults were recruited and divided into two groups including healthy young adults in one group (n=23) and post-COVID-19 patients in the other group (n=23). The young adults were assessed for cardiorespiratory parameters including heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO), rate of perceived exertion (RPE), and leg fatigue before and after performing a 6MWT and a 1-min STST at baseline and the 3-month follow-up. Test sequences were randomly assigned using the website randomizer.org.

Results: Post-COVID-19 had significantly decreased post-HR, post-SBP, post-SpO, post-RPE, post-leg fatigue, and increased the distance of 6MWT, and number of steps of 1-min-STST when compared with the baseline (P<0.05). However, all parameters of cardiorespiratory could recover and return to the values of healthy young adults by the follow-up at 3 months.

Conclusions: Post-COVID-19 who recovered from mild-COVID-19 for about 6 months recovered their cardiorespiratory parameters to the values of healthy young adults.

References
1.
Johnsen S, Sattler S, Miskowiak K, Kunalan K, Victor A, Pedersen L . Descriptive analysis of long COVID sequelae identified in a multidisciplinary clinic serving hospitalised and non-hospitalised patients. ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(3). PMC: 8091683. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00205-2021. View

2.
Hansen H, Beyer N, Frolich A, Godtfredsen N, Bieler T . Intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the 6-minute walk test and the 30-second sit-to-stand test in patients with severe and very severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018; 13:3447-3457. PMC: 6203115. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S174248. View

3.
Blomberg B, Mohn K, Brokstad K, Zhou F, Linchausen D, Hansen B . Long COVID in a prospective cohort of home-isolated patients. Nat Med. 2021; 27(9):1607-1613. PMC: 8440190. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-021-01433-3. View

4.
Vaidya T, de Bisschop C, Beaumont M, Ouksel H, Jean V, Dessables F . Is the 1-minute sit-to-stand test a good tool for the evaluation of the impact of pulmonary rehabilitation? Determination of the minimal important difference in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016; 11:2609-2616. PMC: 5079690. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S115439. View

5.
Akpek M . Does COVID-19 Cause Hypertension?. Angiology. 2021; 73(7):682-687. PMC: 9260192. DOI: 10.1177/00033197211053903. View