» Articles » PMID: 38883322

Effects of Continuous Versus Intermittent Theta-burst TMS on FMRI Connectivity

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jun 17
PMID 38883322
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a noninvasive technique that can be used to evoke distributed network-level effects. Previous work demonstrated that the Hippocampal-Cortical Network responds preferably (i.e., greater memory improvement and increases in hippocampal-network connectivity) to continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol relative to intermittent theta-burst and to 20-Hz rTMS. Here, these data were further analyzed to characterize effects of continuous versus intermittent theta-burst stimulation on network-level connectivity measures - as well as local connectedness - via resting-state fMRI. In contrast to theories that propose continuous and intermittent theta-burst cause local inhibitory versus excitatory effects, respectively, both protocols caused local decreases in fMRI connectivity around the stimulated parietal site. While iTBS caused decreases in connectivity across the hippocampal-cortical network, cTBS caused increases and decreases in connectivity across the network. cTBS had no effect on the parietal-cortical network, whereas iTBS caused decreases in the right parietal cortex (contralateral hemisphere to the stimulation target). These findings suggest that continuous theta-burst may have entrained the endogenous hippocampal-cortical network, whereas the intermittent train was unable to maintain entrainment that may have yielded the long-lasting effects measured in this study (i.e., within 20-min post-stimulation). Furthermore, these effects were specific to the hippocampal-cortical network, which has a putative endogenous functionally-relevant theta rhythm, and not to the parietal network. These results add to the growing body of evidence that suggests effects of theta-burst stimulation are not fully characterized by excitatory/inhibitory theories. Further work is required to understand local and network-level effects of noninvasive stimulation.

References
1.
Lega B, Germi J, Rugg M . Modulation of Oscillatory Power and Connectivity in the Human Posterior Cingulate Cortex Supports the Encoding and Retrieval of Episodic Memories. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017; 29(8):1415-1432. DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01133. View

2.
Kaplan R, Bush D, Bonnefond M, Bandettini P, Barnes G, Doeller C . Medial prefrontal theta phase coupling during spatial memory retrieval. Hippocampus. 2014; 24(6):656-65. PMC: 4028411. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.22255. View

3.
Nee D, DEsposito M . The hierarchical organization of the lateral prefrontal cortex. Elife. 2016; 5. PMC: 4811776. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.12112. View

4.
Berry S, Thompson R . Prediction of learning rate from the hippocampal electroencephalogram. Science. 1978; 200(4347):1298-300. DOI: 10.1126/science.663612. View

5.
Anderson K, Rajagovindan R, Ghacibeh G, Meador K, Ding M . Theta oscillations mediate interaction between prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe in human memory. Cereb Cortex. 2009; 20(7):1604-12. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp223. View