» Articles » PMID: 38882731

Comparative Evaluation of the Apical Sealability of AH Plus and RealSeal SE Using 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite with 17% EDTA and 10% Citric Acid As Irrigants-An Study

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2024 Jun 17
PMID 38882731
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Apical microleakage is considered to be a common reason for the clinical failure of endodontic therapy. Three dimensional sealing of the root canal is one of the main goals of endodontic treatment and is essential for preventing reinfection of the canal and for preserving the health of the periapical tissues, Recently Epoxy resin sealers have been used because of their reduced solubility apical seal and micro-retention to root dentine.

Aim And Objective: This in vitro study was done to evaluate and compare the apical sealability of AH Plus and RealSeal SE using 5.25% sodium hypochlorite with 17% EDTA and 10% citric acid as irrigants. Materials and methods: 44 single-rooted premolars were selected and the teeth are randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10) and 2 control groups (n=2). The extent of dye penetration, from the apical to the coronal part of the root canal, was assessed using a stereomicroscope at 10x magnification for all groups.One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare statistically significant differences among the groups, using SPSS software version 10.0.

Results: Group IV (Citric acid + RealSeal SE) showed a statistically lower mean microleakage when compared to all other groups.

Conclusion: From, the present study, it was concluded that, RealSeal SE sealer with 10% citric acid as irrigant (group IV) showed better apical sealability followed by RealSeal SE sealer with 17% EDTA as irrigant (group III), when compared to AH Plus groups which showed least sealability.

References
1.
Baumgartner J, Cuenin P . Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite for root canal irrigation. J Endod. 1992; 18(12):605-12. DOI: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81331-2. View

2.
Tay F, Hiraishi N, Pashley D, Loushine R, Weller R, Gillespie W . Bondability of Resilon to a methacrylate-based root canal sealer. J Endod. 2006; 32(2):133-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.026. View

3.
Timpawat S, Vongsavan N, Messer H . Effect of removal of the smear layer on apical microleakage. J Endod. 2001; 27(5):351-3. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200105000-00011. View

4.
LESTER K, Boyde A . Scanning electron microscopy of instrumented, irrigated and filled root canals. Br Dent J. 1977; 143(11):359-67. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4804007. View

5.
Yildirim T, Orucoglu H, Kont Cobankara F . Long-term evaluation of the influence of smear layer on the apical sealing ability of MTA. J Endod. 2008; 34(12):1537-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.022. View