Increasing the Rate of Datasets Amenable to CT and Quantitative Plaque Analysis: Value of Software for Reducing Stair-step Artifacts Demonstrated in Photon-counting Detector CT

Overview

Journal Eur J Radiol Open

Specialty Radiology

Date 2024 Jun 17

PMID 38882632

Authors

Costanza Lisi

Lukas J Moser

Victor Mergen

Thomas Flohr

Matthias Eberhard

Hatem Alkadhi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the value of an algorithm for reducing stair-step artifacts for advanced coronary analyses in sequential mode coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

Methods: Forty patients undergoing sequential mode photon-counting detector CCTA with at least one stair-step artifact were included. Twenty patients (14 males; mean age 57±17years) with 45 segments showing stair-step artifacts and without atherosclerosis were included for CT analysis. Twenty patients (20 males; mean age 74±13years) with 22 segments showing stair-step artifacts crossing an atherosclerotic plaque were included for quantitative plaque analysis. Artifacts were graded, and CT and quantitative coronary plaque analyses were performed in standard reconstructions and in those reconstructed with a software (entitled ) for artifact reduction.

Results: Stair-step artifacts were significantly reduced in compared to standard reconstructions (p<0.05). In standard reconstructions, CT was not feasible in 3/45 (7 %) segments but was feasible in all reconstructions. In 9/45 (20 %) segments without atherosclerosis, the algorithm led to a change of CT values from pathologic in standard to physiologic values in reconstructions. In one segment (1/22, 5 %), quantitative plaque analysis was not feasible in standard but only in reconstruction. The mean overall plaque volume (111±60 mm), the calcific (77±47 mm), fibrotic (31±28 mm), and lipidic (4±3 mm) plaque components were higher in standard than in reconstructions (overall 75±50 mm, p<0.001; calcific 51±42 mm, p<0.001; fibrotic 22±19 mm, p<0.05; lipidic 3±3 mm, p=0.055).

Conclusion: Despite the lack of reference standard modalities for CT and coronary plaque analysis, initial evidence indicates that an algorithm for reducing stair-step artifacts in sequential mode CCTA increases the rate and quality of datasets amenable to advanced coronary artery analysis, hereby potentially improving patient management.

References

Lin A, Manral N, McElhinney P, Killekar A, Matsumoto H, Kwiecinski J . Deep learning-enabled coronary CT angiography for plaque and stenosis quantification and cardiac risk prediction: an international multicentre study. Lancet Digit Health. 2022; 4(4):e256-e265. PMC: 9047317. DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00022-X. View

Sato H, Fujimoto S, Kogure Y, Daida H . Feasibility of Macrophage Plaque Imaging Using Novel Ultrasmall Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide in Dual Energy CT. Eur J Radiol Open. 2018; 5:87-91. PMC: 6066595. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2018.05.003. View

Prasad A, Gersh B, Mehran R, Brodie B, Brener S, Dizon J . Effect of Ischemia Duration and Door-to-Balloon Time on Myocardial Perfusion in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Analysis From HORIZONS-AMI Trial (Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 8(15):1966-1974. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.031. View

Paul J, Amato A, Rohnean A . Low-dose coronary-CT angiography using step and shoot at any heart rate: comparison of image quality at systole for high heart rate and diastole for low heart rate with a 128-slice dual-source machine. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 29(3):651-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0110-9. View

Mergen V, Eberhard M, Manka R, Euler A, Alkadhi H . First in-human quantitative plaque characterization with ultra-high resolution coronary photon-counting CT angiography. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 9:981012. PMC: 9485480. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.981012. View

de Graaf M, Broersen A, Kitslaar P, Roos C, Dijkstra J, Lelieveldt B . Automatic quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerosis with computed tomography coronary angiography: cross-correlation with intravascular ultrasound virtual histology. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29(5):1177-90. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0194-x. View

Moser L, Mergen V, Allmendinger T, Manka R, Eberhard M, Alkadhi H . A Novel Reconstruction Technique to Reduce Stair-Step Artifacts in Sequential Mode Coronary CT Angiography. Invest Radiol. 2024; 59(9):622-628. PMC: 11827681. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000001066. View

Panetta D, Gabelloni M, Faggioni L, Pelosi G, Aringhieri G, Caramella D . Cardiac Computed Tomography Perfusion: Contrast Agents, Challenges and Emerging Methodologies from Preclinical Research to the Clinics. Acad Radiol. 2020; 28(1):e1-e13. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.026. View

Park H, Lee B, Shin S, Heo R, Arsanjani R, Kitslaar P . Clinical Feasibility of 3D Automated Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Quantification Algorithm on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2015; 25(10):3073-83. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3698-z. View

10.

Maron D, Hochman J, Reynolds H, Bangalore S, OBrien S, Boden W . Initial Invasive or Conservative Strategy for Stable Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382(15):1395-1407. PMC: 7263833. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915922. View

11.

Foldyna B, Uhlig J, Gohmann R, Lucke C, Mayrhofer T, Lehmkuhl L . Quality and safety of coronary computed tomography angiography at academic and non-academic sites: insights from a large European registry (ESCR MR/CT Registry). Eur Radiol. 2022; 32(8):5246-5255. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08639-0. View

12.

Villines T . Can CT-derived FFR better inform clinical decision-making and improve outcomes in stable ischaemic heart disease?. Eur Heart J. 2018; 39(41):3712-3714. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy559. View

13.

Lebedev S, Fournie E, Stierstorfer K, Kachelriess M . Stack transition artifact removal (STAR) for cardiac CT. Med Phys. 2019; 46(11):4777-4791. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13786. View

14.

Lu M, Ferencik M, Roberts R, Lee K, Ivanov A, Adami E . Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 10(11):1350-1358. PMC: 5632098. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.11.024. View

15.

Stierstorfer K, Rauscher A, Boese J, Bruder H, Schaller S, Flohr T . Weighted FBP--a simple approximate 3D FBP algorithm for multislice spiral CT with good dose usage for arbitrary pitch. Phys Med Biol. 2004; 49(11):2209-18. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/11/007. View

16.

Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, Mintz G, Kunadian V . OCT for the identification of vulnerable plaque in acute coronary syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 8(2):198-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.005. View

17.

Celeng C, Leiner T, Maurovich-Horvat P, Merkely B, de Jong P, Dankbaar J . Anatomical and Functional Computed Tomography for Diagnosing Hemodynamically Significant Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 12(7 Pt 2):1316-1325. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.07.022. View

18.

Sudarski S, Fink C, Sueselbeck T, Kayed H, Schoenberg S, Borggrefe M . Quantitative analysis of coronary plaque composition by dual-source CT in patients with acute non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction compared to patients with stable coronary artery disease correlated with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Acad Radiol. 2013; 20(8):995-1003. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.03.013. View

19.

Ihdayhid A, Zekry S . Machine Learning CT FFR: The Evolving Role of On-Site Techniques. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2021; 2(3):e200228. PMC: 7977798. DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020200228. View

20.

Dey D, Slomka P, Leeson P, Comaniciu D, Shrestha S, Sengupta P . Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73(11):1317-1335. PMC: 6474254. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.054. View