» Articles » PMID: 38882242

Macrophage-2-Binding Protein Glycosylation Isomer (M2BPGi) and AGAP Score As Markers of Noninvasive Test for Liver Fibrosis Versus FibroScan in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study

Overview
Journal Int J Hepatol
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Jun 17
PMID 38882242
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Liver biopsy as the gold standard for assessing the degree and diagnosis of fibrosis still has significant drawbacks, which make the emergence of a much less invasive diagnostic marker possible. M2BPGi levels and the AGAP score, the two newest serological markers, are known to have good sensitivity for detecting liver fibrosis. This study is aimed at determining the validity of examining M2BPGi levels and AGAP scores on the Fibroscan examination as markers of noninvasive test for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B patients.

Methods: This is an observational, descriptive study with a retrospective design. This study used secondary data taken from medical records and blood specimen research materials of outpatients at the Hepatology Gastroenterology Polyclinic at a tertiary general hospital in West Java, Indonesia, with a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B.

Results: There were 109 research subjects included. There were 73 (66.9%) subjects with no- or low-grade fibrosis and 36 (33.1%) with advanced fibrosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the M2BPGi were 88.9% and 61.6% (PPV 55.3%; NPV 91.8%; AUC 0.753), while the AGAP score was 47.2% and 100% (PPV 100%; NPV 79.3%; AUC 0.736). The combined M2BPGi level and the AGAP score showed a sensitivity of 80.9% and a specificity of 100% (PPV 100%; NPV 91.8%; AUC 0.905).

Conclusion: The AGAP score and M2BPGi levels together are a better way to measure the degree of liver fibrosis in people with chronic hepatitis B than either M2BPGi or the AGAP score alone.

Citing Articles

Utility of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer as an excellent biomarker for the prediction of liver fibrosis, activity, and hepatocellular carcinoma onset: an expert review.

Kamada Y, Sumida Y, Takahashi H, Fujii H, Miyoshi E, Nakajima A J Gastroenterol. 2024; 60(1):10-23.

PMID: 39652103 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-024-02179-8.

References
1.
Egbuchulem K . THE BASICS OF SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATION: AN EDITOR'S VIEW. Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2023; 21(1):5-10. PMC: 10388427. View

2.
Zhong L, Zhang G, Luo S, Yin W, Song H . The value of platelet count in evaluating the degree of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020; 34(7):e23270. PMC: 7370727. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23270. View

3.
Zhao X, Shi X, Lv M, Yuan B, Wu J . Prevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B virus infection among household members: a cross-sectional study in Beijing. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021; 17(6):1818-1824. PMC: 8115595. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1847951. View

4.
Nakamura M, Kanda T, Jiang X, Haga Y, Takahashi K, Wu S . Serum microRNA-122 and Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein are useful tools for liquid biopsy of the patients with hepatitis B virus and advanced liver fibrosis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177302. PMC: 5419651. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177302. View

5.
Nah E, Cho S, Kim S, Kim H, Cho H . Diagnostic performance of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) in screening liver fibrosis in health checkups. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020; 34(8):e23316. PMC: 7439422. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23316. View