» Articles » PMID: 38881961

Sensitivity After Clitoral Reconstruction in Patients with Female Genital Mutilation

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2024 Jun 17
PMID 38881961
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the past decades, reconstructive choices after female genital mutilation extended beyond de-infibulation and scar release. The current trend to expand techniques addressing sexual and aesthetic aspects by reconstructing the clitoris and prepuce, and dissecting the clitoral nerves raises concern, as there is a paucity of evidence on the functional outcomes and suspected iatrogenic lacerations.

Methods: A total of 128 female genital mutilation patients were included in the study. To evaluate clitoral sensitivity after elevation, the Semmes-Weinstein-monofilament test was performed before and after genital reconstruction.

Results: Preoperatively, patients with a visually intact clitoris showed significantly better sensitivity compared with patients with a mutilated clitoris or infibulation ( < 0.0001). Surgery was performed in 84 patients. After clitoral reconstruction (CR), 70 of 73 patients were able to perceive 2.83 monofilaments (95.9%), whereas three perceived 3.61. Patients with a visually intact clitoris served as control, and 95.0% perceived 2.83 monofilaments. We showed a significant improvement of clitoral sensitivity ( = 0.0020) in the subgroup consisting of patients with a mutilated clitoris in whom the test was performed before and after reconstruction.

Conclusions: Clitoral sensitivity improves significantly after CR. Seventy of 73 patients attained the same sensitivity as unharmed women. No patient showed a decreased sensitivity compared with their preoperative findings. Therefore, our study supports the argument that CR offers sufficient improvement of objective clitoral sensitivity without additionally addressing clitoral nerves.

References
1.
Catania L, Abdulcadir O, Puppo V, Verde J, Abdulcadir J, Abdulcadir D . Pleasure and orgasm in women with Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C). J Sex Med. 2007; 4(6):1666-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00620.x. View

2.
Cordeau D, Belanger M, Beaulieu-Prevost D, Courtois F . The assessment of sensory detection thresholds on the perineum and breast compared with control body sites. J Sex Med. 2014; 11(7):1741-8. DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12547. View

3.
Foldes P, Cuzin B, Andro A . Reconstructive surgery after female genital mutilation: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2012; 380(9837):134-41. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60400-0. View

4.
Akinbiyi T, Langston E, Percec I . Female Genital Mutilation Reconstruction for Plastic Surgeons-A Call to Arms. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 6(11):e1945. PMC: 6414122. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001945. View

5.
Adidharma W, Khouri A, Lee J, Vanderboll K, Kung T, Cederna P . Sensory nerve regeneration and reinnervation in muscle following peripheral nerve injury. Muscle Nerve. 2022; 66(4):384-396. DOI: 10.1002/mus.27661. View