» Articles » PMID: 38879676

A Qualitative Assessment of Limits of Active Flight in Low Density Atmospheres

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2024 Jun 15
PMID 38879676
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Exoplanet atmospheres are expected to vary significantly in thickness and chemical composition, leading to a continuum of differences in surface pressure and atmospheric density. This variability is exemplified within our Solar System, where the four rocky planets exhibit surface pressures ranging from 1 nPa on Mercury to 9.2 MPa on Venus. The direct effects and potential challenges of atmospheric pressure and density on life have rarely been discussed. For instance, atmospheric density directly affects the possibility of active flight in organisms, a critical factor since without it, dispersing across extensive and inhospitable terrains becomes a major limitation for the expansion of complex life. In this paper, we propose the existence of a critical atmospheric density threshold below which active flight is unfeasible, significantly impacting biosphere development. To qualitatively assess this threshold and differentiate it from energy availability constraints, we analyze the limits of active flight on Earth, using the common fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, as a model organism. We subjected Drosophila melanogaster to various atmospheric density scenarios and reviewed previous data on flight limitations. Our observations show that flies in an N-enriched environment recover active flying abilities more efficiently than those in a helium-enriched environment, highlighting behavioral differences attributable to atmospheric density vs. oxygen deprivation.

References
1.
Abreu F, Martins J, Silveira T, Keim C, Lins de Barros H, Filho F . 'Candidatus Magnetoglobus multicellularis', a multicellular, magnetotactic prokaryote from a hypersaline environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007; 57(Pt 6):1318-1322. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.64857-0. View

2.
Barrowclough G, Cracraft J, Klicka J, Zink R . How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?. PLoS One. 2016; 11(11):e0166307. PMC: 5120813. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166307. View

3.
Flores E, Herrero A . Compartmentalized function through cell differentiation in filamentous cyanobacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009; 8(1):39-50. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2242. View

4.
Bains W, Schulze-Makuch D . Mechanisms of Evolutionary Innovation Point to Genetic Control Logic as the Key Difference Between Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes. J Mol Evol. 2015; 81(1-2):34-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00239-015-9688-6. View

5.
Wenter R, Wanner G, Schuler D, Overmann J . Ultrastructure, tactic behaviour and potential for sulfate reduction of a novel multicellular magnetotactic prokaryote from North Sea sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2009; 11(6):1493-505. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.01877.x. View