» Articles » PMID: 38879487

Real-world Performance of HIV Low Viral Load Values in Diagnosing Acute HIV Infection in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Beijing, China

Overview
Journal BMC Infect Dis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Jun 15
PMID 38879487
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis of HIV infection decreases the time from HIV diagnosis to viral suppression and reduces further HIV transmission. The Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS (2021 edition) state that an HIV RNA level > 5,000 copies/mL is the threshold for diagnosing HIV infection. The impact of low viral load values on HIV diagnosis needs to be investigated.

Methods: There were 3455 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV1 + 2) antibody results (immunoblotting method) and 65,129 HIV viral load values at Beijing Youan Hospital from 2019 to 2022. A total of 2434 patients had both antibody confirmatory results and viral load results. The confirmatory antibody results and HIV viral load results of 2434 patients were analyzed to investigate the impact of low viral load values on HIV diagnosis.

Results: Of the 2434 patients who had both confirmatory antibody results and viral load results, the viral load values of 140 patients (5.8%) had viral loads ranging from 40 copies/mL to 5,000 copies/mL before positive confirmatory antibody result, and of these 140 patients, the sample receipt time for the viral load tests of 96 (66.7%) individuals was 1 to 6 days earlier than the corresponding sample receipt time for the confirmatory antibody test. In addition, 34 patients (1.4%) had low viral loads ranging from 40 copies/mL to 1,000 copies/mL before positive confirmatory antibody result.

Conclusion: This study revealed that there is a risk of missed diagnosis if a threshold of 5000 copies/mL is used for the diagnosis of HIV infection. These data provide valuable information for the early diagnosis of HIV infection, and our findings have potential benefits for decreasing HIV transmission.

References
1.
de Souza M, Phanuphak N, Pinyakorn S, Trichavaroj R, Pattanachaiwit S, Chomchey N . Impact of nucleic acid testing relative to antigen/antibody combination immunoassay on the detection of acute HIV infection. AIDS. 2015; 29(7):793-800. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000616. View

2.
Hauser J, Hong H, Babady N, Papanicolaou G, Tang Y . False-Positive Results for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing in Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy. J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 58(1). PMC: 6935905. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01420-19. View

3.
Kerschberger B, Aung A, Mpala Q, Ntshalintshali N, Mamba C, Schomaker M . Predicting, Diagnosing, and Treating Acute and Early HIV Infection in a Public Sector Facility in Eswatini. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021; 88(5):506-517. PMC: 8575170. DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002794. View

4.
Gokengin D, Wilson-Davies E, Nazli Zeka A, Palfreeman A, Begovac J, Dedes N . 2021 European guideline on HIV testing in genito-urinary medicine settings. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021; 35(5):1043-1057. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17139. View

5.
Pilcher C, Fiscus S, Nguyen T, Foust E, Wolf L, Williams D . Detection of acute infections during HIV testing in North Carolina. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352(18):1873-83. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa042291. View