» Articles » PMID: 38879452

Prognostic Utility of Pericardial Effusion in the General Population: Findings From the STAAB Cohort Study

Overview
Date 2024 Jun 15
PMID 38879452
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The incidental finding of a pericardial effusion (PE) poses a challenge in clinical care. PE is associated with malignant conditions or severe cardiac disease but may also be observed in healthy individuals. This study explored the prevalence, determinants, course, and prognostic relevance of PE in a population-based cohort.

Methods And Results: The STAAB (Characteristics and Course of Heart Failure Stages A/B and Determinants of Progression) cohort study recruited a representative sample of the population of Würzburg, aged 30 to 79 years. Participants underwent quality-controlled transthoracic echocardiography including the dedicated evaluation of the pericardial space. Of 4965 individuals included at baseline (mean age, 55±12 years; 52% women), 134 (2.7%) exhibited an incidentally diagnosed PE (median diameter, 2.7 mm; quartiles, 2.0-4.1 mm). In multivariable logistic regression, lower body mass index and higher NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) levels were associated with PE at baseline, whereas inflammation, malignancy, and rheumatoid disease were not. Among the 3901 participants attending the follow-up examination after a median time of 34 (30-41) months, PE was found in 60 individuals (1.5%; n=18 new PE, n=42 persistent PE). Within the follow-up period, 37 participants died and 93 participants reported a newly diagnosed malignancy. The presence of PE did not predict all-cause death or the development of new malignancy.

Conclusions: Incidental PE was detected in about 3% of individuals, with the vast majority measuring <10 mm and completely resolving. PE was not associated with inflammation markers, death, incident heart failure, or malignancy. Our findings corroborate the view of current guidelines that a small PE in asymptomatic individuals can be considered an innocent phenomenon and does not require extensive short-term monitoring.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular Involvement in Tuberculosis Patients Treated in Southern Africa.

Samim D, Muula G, Banholzer N, Chibomba D, Xulu S, Bolton C JACC Adv. 2024; 4(1):101427.

PMID: 39720579 PMC: 11667022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101427.

References
1.
Tayal V, Kline J . Emergency echocardiography to detect pericardial effusion in patients in PEA and near-PEA states. Resuscitation. 2003; 59(3):315-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00245-4. View

2.
Wang J, Patel M, Xiao M, Xu Z, Jiang S, Sun X . Incidence and predictors of asymptomatic pericardial effusion after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. EuroIntervention. 2016; 12(2):e250-6. DOI: 10.4244/EIJV12I2A39. View

3.
Guindo J . Comments on the 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases. A Report by the Spanish Society of Cardiology Guidelines Committee Working Group. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2015; 68(12):1068-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2015.11.002. View

4.
Mitiku T, Heidenreich P . A small pericardial effusion is a marker of increased mortality. Am Heart J. 2010; 161(1):152-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.007. View

5.
Sahiti F, Morbach C, Cejka V, Tiffe T, Wagner M, Eichner F . Impact of cardiovascular risk factors on myocardial work-insights from the STAAB cohort study. J Hum Hypertens. 2021; 36(3):235-245. PMC: 8930764. DOI: 10.1038/s41371-021-00509-4. View