» Articles » PMID: 38875043

Cognitive Assessment with Cognivue Clarity®: Psychometric Properties and Normative Ranges in a Diverse Population

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialties Geriatrics
Neurology
Date 2024 Jun 14
PMID 38875043
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Detecting cognitive impairment in clinical practice is challenging as most instruments do not perform well in diverse samples of older adults. These same instruments are often used for eligibility into clinical trials making it difficult to recruit minoritized adults into Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies. Cognivue Clarity® is an FDA-cleared computerized 10-minute cognitive screening platform using adaptive psychophysics to detect cognitive impairment.

Objective: Test the ability of Cognivue Clarity to measure cognitive performance in a diverse community sample compared with the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS).

Methods: This study enrolled 452 participants across 6 US study sites and completed both Cognivue Clarity device and RBANS. Psychometric properties and exploratory factor analysis of Cognivue Clarity were explored and comparisons against RBANS across different age, sex, education, and ethnoracial groups were conducted.

Results: Participants had a mean age of 47.9±16.1 years (range: 18-85), 63.6% were female, 45.9% had ≤12 years of education, 31.2% were African American and 9.2% were Hispanic. Cognivue Clarity had strong internal consistency, test-retest reliability and minimal practice effects. A 4-factor structure (Memory, Attention, Visuomotor, and Discrimination) had excellent goodness-of-fit. Normalizing age effects improved performance. Race and education effects were similar to those seen with RBANS. Cognivue Clarity had strong correlations with RBANS.

Conclusions: Our study supports the use of Cognivue Clarity as an easy-to-use, brief, and valid cognitive assessment that measures cognitive performance. In the correct clinical setting, Cognivue Clarity may identify individuals with likely cognitive impairment who could be candidates for AD research studies.

Citing Articles

The Dementia Literacy Assessment (DeLA): A novel measure of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders health literacy in diverse populations.

Galvin J, Germain D, Moore C, Jeanty J, Tofaeono V, Wiese L Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2025; 11(1):e70054.

PMID: 39975469 PMC: 11837737. DOI: 10.1002/trc2.70054.


Cognivue Clarity characterizes mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease in biomarker confirmed cohorts in the Bio-Hermes Study.

Galvin J, Kleiman M, Estes P, Harris H, Fung E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24519.

PMID: 39424626 PMC: 11489461. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75304-5.

References
1.
Liu Y, Jun H, Becker A, Wallick C, Mattke S . Detection Rates of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Primary Care for the United States Medicare Population. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024; 11(1):7-12. PMC: 10995024. DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2023.131. View

2.
Jiang S, Hong Y . Clinical trial participation in America: The roles of eHealth engagement and patient-provider communication. Digit Health. 2021; 7:20552076211067658. PMC: 8679028. DOI: 10.1177/20552076211067658. View

3.
Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock E, Condit D . Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003; 24(8):1094-102. DOI: 10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379. View

4.
Hale J, Schneider D, Mehta N, Myrskyla M . Cognitive impairment in the U.S.: Lifetime risk, age at onset, and years impaired. SSM Popul Health. 2020; 11:100577. PMC: 7153285. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100577. View

5.
van Dyck C, Swanson C, Aisen P, Bateman R, Chen C, Gee M . Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2022; 388(1):9-21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212948. View