» Articles » PMID: 38874546

The "sweet- and Sour-spot" of Occupational Physical Activity for Back Pain: a Prospective Accelerometer Study Among Eldercare Workers

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Both high and low levels of occupational physical activity are associated with back pain. Thus, there might be a "sweet- and sour-spot" of occupational physical activity for back pain. Our aim was to investigate if there exists an occupational physical activity "sweet- (lowest risk) and sour-spot" (highest risk) for back pain.

Methods: A total of 396 eldercare workers from 20 Danish nursing homes participated. Occupational physical activity was measured between 1-4 working days using thigh-worn accelerometry. Back pain intensity was reported monthly on a scale from 0-10 over 1-year. A zero-inflated mixed-effects model was developed regressing occupational physical activity against back pain, adjusted for confounders. The "sweet- and sour-spot" were defined as the occupational physical activity compositions (sitting, standing, light, and moderate-to-vigorous) associated with the 5% lowest and highest risk for back pain, respectively.

Results: The composition associated with the lowest risk of back pain - the "sweet-spot"- consisted of 71% worktime spent sitting, 18% spent standing, 5% spent on light physical activity and 6% spent on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. The composition associated with highest risk for back pain -the "sour-spot"- consisted of 8% worktime spent sitting, 66% spent standing, 4% spent on light physical activity, and 21% spent on moderate-to-vigorous physical activity.

Conclusions: The "sweet-spot" of occupational physical activity for back pain among eldercare workers involves more sitting and light physical activity time, while the "sour-spot" involves more standing and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity time. Research on the occupational physical activity "sweet- and sour-spot" is needed.

References
1.
Holtermann A, Clausen T, Jorgensen M, Burdorf A, Andersen L . Patient handling and risk for developing persistent low-back pain among female healthcare workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012; 39(2):164-9. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3329. View

2.
Andersen L, Fallentin N, Thorsen S, Holtermann A . Physical workload and risk of long-term sickness absence in the general working population and among blue-collar workers: prospective cohort study with register follow-up. Occup Environ Med. 2016; 73(4):246-53. DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103314. View

3.
Gupta N, Lund Rasmussen C, Hartvigsen J, Mortensen O, Clays E, Bultmann U . Physical Activity Advice for Prevention and Rehabilitation of Low Back Pain- Same or Different? A Study on Device-Measured Physical Activity and Register-Based Sickness Absence. J Occup Rehabil. 2021; 32(2):284-294. PMC: 9232440. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-021-10005-8. View

4.
Lunde L, Koch M, Knardahl S, Veiersted K . Associations of objectively measured sitting and standing with low-back pain intensity: a 6-month follow-up of construction and healthcare workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017; 43(3):269-278. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3628. View

5.
Gupta N, Mathiassen S, Mateu-Figueras G, Heiden M, Hallman D, Jorgensen M . A comparison of standard and compositional data analysis in studies addressing group differences in sedentary behavior and physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):53. PMC: 6003121. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-018-0685-1. View