» Articles » PMID: 38873654

The Distinct and Potentially Conflicting Effects of TDCS and TRNS on Brain Connectivity, Cortical Inhibition, and Visuospatial Memory

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jun 14
PMID 38873654
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, including transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS), are emerging as promising tools for enhancing cognitive functions by modulating brain activity and enhancing cognitive functions. Despite their potential, the specific and combined effects of tDCS and tRNS on brain functions, especially regarding functional connectivity, cortical inhibition, and memory performance, are not well-understood. This study aims to explore the distinct and combined impacts of tDCS and tRNS on these neural and cognitive parameters. Using a within-subject design, ten participants underwent four stimulation conditions: sham, tDCS, tRNS, and combined tDCS + tRNS. We assessed the impact on resting-state functional connectivity, cortical inhibition via Cortical Silent Period (CSP), and visuospatial memory performance using the Corsi Block-tapping Test (CBT). Our results indicate that while tDCS appears to induce brain lateralization, tRNS has more generalized and dispersive effects. Interestingly, the combined application of tDCS and tRNS did not amplify these effects but rather suggested a non-synergistic interaction, possibly due to divergent mechanistic pathways, as observed across fMRI, CSP, and CBT measures. These findings illuminate the complex interplay between tDCS and tRNS, highlighting their non-additive effects when used concurrently and underscoring the necessity for further research to optimize their application for cognitive enhancement.

Citing Articles

Brain Stimulation Techniques in Research and Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Applications and Therapeutic Potential in Parkinson's Disease.

Moshayedi A, Mokhtari T, Andani M Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851388 PMC: 11763832. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010020.

References
1.
Mondino M, Ghumman S, Gane C, Renauld E, Whittingstall K, Fecteau S . Effects of Transcranial Stimulation With Direct and Alternating Current on Resting-State Functional Connectivity: An Exploratory Study Simultaneously Combining Stimulation and Multiband Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 13:474. PMC: 7012783. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00474. View

2.
Esmaeilpour Z, Marangolo P, Hampstead B, Bestmann S, Galletta E, Knotkova H . Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes. Brain Stimul. 2017; 11(2):310-321. PMC: 7050474. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.002. View

3.
Bikson M, Brunoni A, Charvet L, Clark V, Cohen L, Deng Z . Rigor and reproducibility in research with transcranial electrical stimulation: An NIMH-sponsored workshop. Brain Stimul. 2018; 11(3):465-480. PMC: 5997279. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.008. View

4.
Brem A, Almquist J, Mansfield K, Plessow F, Sella F, Santarnecchi E . Modulating fluid intelligence performance through combined cognitive training and brain stimulation. Neuropsychologia. 2018; 118(Pt A):107-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.008. View

5.
Stagg C, Antal A, Nitsche M . Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. J ECT. 2018; 34(3):144-152. DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000510. View