Causal Relationships Between Body Mass Index, Low-density Lipoprotein and Bone Mineral Density: Univariable and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2024 Jun 13

PMID 38870109

Authors

Yuxiang Wu

Weiwei Ma

Zhenda Cheng

Qiwei Zhang

Zhaodong Li

Punan Weng

Bushuang Li

Zhiqiang Huang

Changlong Fu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Summary: Utilizing the Mendelian randomization technique, this research clarifies the putative causal relationship between body mass index (BMI) andbone mineral density (BMD), and the mediating role of low-density lipoprotein (LDL). The implications of these findings present promising opportunities for enhancing our understanding of complex bone-related characteristics and disorders, offering potential directions for treatment and intervention.

Objective: The objective of this study is to examine the correlation between BMI and BMD, while exploring the intermediary role of LDL in mediating the causal impact of BMI on BMD outcomes via Mendelian randomization.

Methods: In this study, we employed genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on BMI, LDL, and BMD to conduct a comparative analysis using both univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization.

Results: Our study employed a two-sample Mendelian randomization design. Considering BMI as the exposure and BMD as the outcome, our results suggest that BMI may function as a potential protective factor for BMD (β = 0.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09, P = 0.01). However, when treating LDL as the exposure and BMD as the outcome, our findings indicate LDL as a risk factor for BMD (β = -0.04, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99, P = 0.04). In our multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR) model, the combined influence of BMI and LDL was used as the exposure for BMD outcomes. The analysis pointed towards a substantial protective effect of LDL on BMD (β = 0.08, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.97, P = 0.006). In the analysis of mediation effects, LDL was found to mediate the relationship between BMI and BMD, and the effect was calculated at (β = 0.05, 95% CI 1.052 to 1.048, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that BMI may be considered a protective factor for BMD, while LDL may act as a risk factor. Moreover, LDL appears to play a mediatory role in the causal influence of BMI on BMD.

Citing Articles

Smoking may be a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome: Insights from Mendelian randomization analysis.

Shi W, Wu K, Li H, Zhang H Tob Induc Dis. 2025; 23.

PMID: 39886524 PMC: 11780312. DOI: 10.18332/tid/199930.

References

Carter A, Sanderson E, Hammerton G, Richmond R, Davey Smith G, Heron J . Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021; 36(5):465-478. PMC: 8159796. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00757-1. View

Hartwig F, Davies N, Hemani G, Davey Smith G . Two-sample Mendelian randomization: avoiding the downsides of a powerful, widely applicable but potentially fallible technique. Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 45(6):1717-1726. PMC: 5722032. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyx028. View

Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper K, Zheng Z, Wood A, Weedon M . Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet. 2018; 27(20):3641-3649. PMC: 6488973. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy271. View

Bell J, Richardson T, Wang Q, Sanderson E, Palmer T, Walker V . Effects of general and central adiposity on circulating lipoprotein, lipid, and metabolite levels in UK Biobank: A multivariable Mendelian randomization study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022; 21:100457. PMC: 9272390. DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100457. View

Lee S, Lee J, Sung J . Obesity and Bone Health Revisited: A Mendelian Randomization Study for Koreans. J Bone Miner Res. 2019; 34(6):1058-1067. PMC: 6946936. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3678. View

Sun R, Ma J, Duan L, Zhu J, Yu S, Huang H . [Threshold effects of body mass index on the bone mineral density of Chinese rural women in fluorosis area]. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020; 54(11):1295-1299. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200825-01150. View

Hasan B, Nayfeh T, Alzuabi M, Wang Z, Kuchkuntla A, Prokop L . Weight Loss and Serum Lipids in Overweight and Obese Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020; 105(12). DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa673. View

Hoi-Yee Li G, Cheung C, Au P, Choon-Beng Tan K, Wong I, Sham P . Positive effects of low LDL-C and statins on bone mineral density: an integrated epidemiological observation analysis and Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol. 2019; 49(4):1221-1235. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyz145. View

Gala H, Tomlinson I . The use of Mendelian randomisation to identify causal cancer risk factors: promise and limitations. J Pathol. 2020; 250(5):541-554. DOI: 10.1002/path.5421. View

10.

Vranic L, Mikolasevic I, Milic S . Vitamin D Deficiency: Consequence or Cause of Obesity?. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019; 55(9). PMC: 6780345. DOI: 10.3390/medicina55090541. View

11.

Minelli C, Del Greco M F, van der Plaat D, Bowden J, Sheehan N, Thompson J . The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets. Int J Epidemiol. 2021; 50(5):1651-1659. PMC: 8580269. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab084. View

12.

Zheng J, Baird D, Borges M, Bowden J, Hemani G, Haycock P . Recent Developments in Mendelian Randomization Studies. Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2017; 4(4):330-345. PMC: 5711966. DOI: 10.1007/s40471-017-0128-6. View

13.

Song J, Zhang R, Lv L, Liang J, Wang W, Liu R . The Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Bone Mineral Density: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Calcif Tissue Int. 2020; 107(5):440-445. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-020-00736-w. View

14.

Yang X, Cui Z, Zhang H, Wei X, Feng G, Liu L . Causal link between lipid profile and bone mineral density: A Mendelian randomization study. Bone. 2019; 127:37-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.05.037. View

15.

Bowden J, Del Greco M F, Minelli C, Davey Smith G, Sheehan N, Thompson J . A framework for the investigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian randomization. Stat Med. 2017; 36(11):1783-1802. PMC: 5434863. DOI: 10.1002/sim.7221. View

16.

. Rising rural body-mass index is the main driver of the global obesity epidemic in adults. Nature. 2019; 569(7755):260-264. PMC: 6784868. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1171-x. View

17.

Chen H, Lips P, Vervloet M, van Schoor N, de Jongh R . Association of renal function with bone mineral density and fracture risk in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam. Osteoporos Int. 2018; 29(9):2129-2138. PMC: 6105137. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4592-8. View

18.

Hwang J, Yoo J, Yoon H, Han T, Yoon J, An S . The Role of Leptin in the Association between Obesity and Psoriasis. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2020; 29(1):11-21. PMC: 7771847. DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2020.054. View

19.

Sahin Ersoy G, Simsek E, Vatansever D, Kasikci H, Keser B, Sakin O . Lipid profile and plasma atherogenic index in postmenopausal osteoporosis. North Clin Istanb. 2017; 4(3):237-241. PMC: 5724918. DOI: 10.14744/nci.2017.61587. View

20.

Goettsch C, Rauner M, Sinningen K, Helas S, Al-Fakhri N, Nemeth K . The osteoclast-associated receptor (OSCAR) is a novel receptor regulated by oxidized low-density lipoprotein in human endothelial cells. Endocrinology. 2011; 152(12):4915-26. DOI: 10.1210/en.2011-1282. View