» Articles » PMID: 38869747

Examining the Fraternal Birth Order Effect and Sexual Orientation: Insights from an East European Population

Overview
Journal Arch Sex Behav
Date 2024 Jun 13
PMID 38869747
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of human sexual orientation remains a complex and multifaceted subject. It is often studied but its origins continue to elude us. In this preregistered study, our primary objective was to demonstrate the fraternal birth order effect (FBOE), which assumes a higher prevalence of older brothers in gay men than in their straight counterparts and which has also been recently recorded in lesbian women. Our second aim was to explore any potential impact of the FBOE on anal-erotic role orientation (AERO), both in gay and straight men. Our study sample included 693 gay men, 843 straight men, 265 lesbian women, and 331 straight women from Czechia and Slovakia. Employing a conventionally parameterized logistic regression model, we substantiated the FBOE among both gay men (OR = 1.35 for maternal older brothers) and lesbian women (OR = 1.71). These outcomes were confirmed by a more nuanced parameterization recently proposed by Blanchard (2022). Nonmaternal older brothers did not exhibit a significant influence on their younger brothers' sexual orientation. Contrary to some earlier reports, however, our data did not establish the FBOE as exclusive to gay men with the receptive AERO. Furthermore, our observations indicated a lower offspring count for mothers of gay men compared to mothers of straight men. Emphasizing the positive FBOE outcomes, we acknowledge the need for caution regarding the various options that can be used to estimate the familial influences on sexual orientation.

Citing Articles

Crusaders, monks and family fortunes: evolutionary models of male homosexuality and related phenomena.

Turecek P, Fort J, Flegr J Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2042):20242756.

PMID: 40040457 PMC: 11880841. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2756.


Birth Order and Family Size of UK Biobank Subjects Identified as Asexual, Bisexual, Heterosexual, or Homosexual According to Self-Reported Sexual Histories.

Kabatek J, Blanchard R Arch Sex Behav. 2024; 54(1):35-50.

PMID: 39354277 PMC: 11782301. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-024-03004-2.

References
1.
Zietsch B, Sidari M, Abdellaoui A, Maier R, Langstrom N, Guo S . Genomic evidence consistent with antagonistic pleiotropy may help explain the evolutionary maintenance of same-sex sexual behaviour in humans. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(9):1251-1258. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01168-8. View

2.
Ablaza C, Kabatek J, Perales F . Are Sibship Characteristics Predictive of Same Sex Marriage? An Examination of Fraternal Birth Order and Female Fecundity Effects in Population-level Administrative Data from the Netherlands. J Sex Res. 2022; 59(6):671-683. DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2021.1974330. View

3.
Blanchard R, Klassen P . H-Y antigen and homosexuality in men. J Theor Biol. 1997; 185(3):373-8. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0315. View

4.
Haig D . Interbirth intervals: Intrafamilial, intragenomic and intrasomatic conflict. Evol Med Public Health. 2014; 2014(1):12-7. PMC: 3917425. DOI: 10.1093/emph/eou002. View

5.
Iemmola F, Camperio Ciani A . New evidence of genetic factors influencing sexual orientation in men: female fecundity increase in the maternal line. Arch Sex Behav. 2008; 38(3):393-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-008-9381-6. View