Promoting Child and Adolescent Health Through Wearable Technology: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Digit Health

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2024 Jun 13

PMID 38868368

Authors

Wei Zhang

Keying Xiong

Chengyan Zhu

Richard Evans

Lijuan Zhou

Christine Podrini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Wearable technology is used in healthcare to monitor the health of individuals. This study presents an updated systematic literature review of the use of wearable technology in promoting child and adolescent health, accompanied by recommendations for future research.

Methods: This review focuses on studies involving children and adolescents aged between 2 and 18 years, regardless of their health condition or disabilities. Studies that were published from 2016 to 2024, and which met the inclusion criteria, were extracted from four academic databases (i.e. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Data on intervention purposes, interventions deployed, intervention duration, measurements, and the main outcomes of the studies were collected.

Results: A total of 53 studies involving 14,852 participants were reviewed. They focused on various aspects, including the ownership and use of wearable devices ( = 3), the feasibility ( = 22), effectiveness ( = 4), and adherence ( = 2) of intervention strategies, or a combination of multiple aspects ( = 22). Among the interventions deployed, Fitbit was the most frequently used, featuring in 26 studies, followed by ActiGraph ( = 11). In intervention studies, the majority of studies focused on pre-morbidity prevention ( = 26) and the treatment of illnesses ( = 20), with limited attention given to postoperative monitoring ( = 4).

Conclusions: The use of wearable technology by children and adolescents has proven to be both feasible and effective for health promotion. This systematic review summarizes existing research by exploring the use of wearable technology in promoting health across diverse youth populations, including healthy and unhealthy individuals. It examines health promotion at various stages of the disease continuum, including pre-disease prevention, in-disease treatment, and postoperative monitoring. Additionally, the review provides directions for future research.

Citing Articles

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Obesity Risk Prediction and Management: Approaches, Insights, and Recommendations.

Huang L, Huhulea E, Abraham E, Bienenstock R, Aifuwa E, Hirani R Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(2).

PMID: 40005474 PMC: 11857386. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61020358.

References

Evans E, Abrantes A, Chen E, Jelalian E . Using Novel Technology within a School-Based Setting to Increase Physical Activity: A Pilot Study in School-Age Children from a Low-Income, Urban Community. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2017:4271483. PMC: 5833882. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4271483. View

Daskivich T, Houman J, Lopez M, Luu M, Fleshner P, Zaghiyan K . Association of Wearable Activity Monitors With Assessment of Daily Ambulation and Length of Stay Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(2):e187673. PMC: 6484591. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7673. View

Ng K, Kokko S, Tammelin T, Kallio J, Belton S, OBrien W . Clusters of Adolescent Physical Activity Tracker Patterns and Their Associations With Physical Activity Behaviors in Finland and Ireland: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(9):e18509. PMC: 7492981. DOI: 10.2196/18509. View

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021; 10(1):89. PMC: 8008539. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4. View

Mackintosh K, Chappel S, Salmon J, Timperio A, Ball K, Brown H . Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(11):e13858. PMC: 6861996. DOI: 10.2196/13858. View

Price L, Wyatt K, Lloyd J, Abraham C, Creanor S, Dean S . Children's Compliance With Wrist-Worn Accelerometry Within a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial: Findings From the Healthy Lifestyles Programme. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2018; 30(2):281-287. DOI: 10.1123/pes.2017-0179. View

Hallal P, Andersen L, Bull F, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U . Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012; 380(9838):247-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1. View

Sun X, Adams S, Li C, Booth J, Robertson J, Fawkner S . Validity of the Fitbit Ace and Moki Devices for Assessing Steps During Different Walking Conditions in Young Adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2021; 34(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1123/pes.2021-0026. View

Byun W, Lee J, Kim Y, Brusseau T . Classification Accuracy of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Assessing Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity in 3-5-Year-Old Children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4). PMC: 5923636. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15040594. View

10.

Viciana J, Casado-Robles C, Guijarro-Romero S, Mayorga-Vega D . Are Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers and Mobile Applications Valid for Assessing Physical Activity in High School Students? Wearfit Study. J Sports Sci Med. 2022; 21(3):356-375. PMC: 9459775. DOI: 10.52082/jssm.2022.356. View

11.

Cheng L, Duan M, Mao X, Ge Y, Wang Y, Huang H . The effect of digital health technologies on managing symptoms across pediatric cancer continuum: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci. 2021; 8(1):22-29. PMC: 7859551. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.10.002. View

12.

Vaughn J, Summers-Goeckerman E, Shaw R, Shah N . A Protocol to Assess Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability of Mobile Technology for Symptom Management in Pediatric Transplant Patients. Nurs Res. 2019; 68(4):317-323. PMC: 6602819. DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000343. View

13.

Koorts H, Salmon J, Timperio A, Ball K, Macfarlane S, Lai S . Translatability of a Wearable Technology Intervention to Increase Adolescent Physical Activity: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(8):e13573. PMC: 7442941. DOI: 10.2196/13573. View

14.

Conner B, Schwartz M, Lerner Z . Pilot evaluation of changes in motor control after wearable robotic resistance training in children with cerebral palsy. J Biomech. 2021; 126:110601. PMC: 8453102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110601. View

15.

Drehlich M, Naraine M, Rowe K, Lai S, Salmon J, Brown H . Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Adolescents' Perspectives on Combining Technologies for Physical Activity Promotion Within an Intervention: Usability Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(3):e15552. PMC: 7084284. DOI: 10.2196/15552. View

16.

Yang H, Kang J, Kim O, Choi M, Oh M, Nam J . Interventions for Preventing Childhood Obesity with Smartphones and Wearable Device: A Protocol for a Non-Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017; 14(2). PMC: 5334738. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14020184. View

17.

Caillaud C, Ledger S, Diaz C, Clerc G, Galy O, Yacef K . iEngage: A digital health education program designed to enhance physical activity in young adolescents. PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0274644. PMC: 9534399. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274644. View

18.

Gaudet J, Gallant F, Belanger M . A Bit of Fit: Minimalist Intervention in Adolescents Based on a Physical Activity Tracker. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017; 5(7):e92. PMC: 5519831. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.7647. View

19.

Galy O, Yacef K, Caillaud C . Improving Pacific Adolescents' Physical Activity Toward International Recommendations: Exploratory Study of a Digital Education App Coupled With Activity Trackers. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(12):e14854. PMC: 6931053. DOI: 10.2196/14854. View

20.

Ghomrawi H, Baumann L, Kwon S, Hebal F, Hsiung G, Williams K . Using accelerometers to characterize recovery after surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 53(8):1600-1605. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.09.016. View