» Articles » PMID: 38868037

Cone-beam CT Evaluation of Post-extraction Alveolar Bone Changes at the Maxillary Incisor Sites in an East Asian Population: A Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 Jun 13
PMID 38868037
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Understanding the characteristics of alveolar bone resorption in an East Asian population after maxillary incisor extraction and providing a reference for implant treatment plans.

Study Design: Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) data of 125 East Asian patients with unilateral extraction of maxillary incisors for 3 months were collected. The alveolar bone width and height in the extraction sites were measured and compared with the corresponding contralateral sites.

Results: The differences in alveolar bone width between the extraction site and contralateral site were as follows: 4.11 mm, 2.68 mm, and 2.09 mm (3 mm, 5 mm, 7 mm apical from CEJ of the contralateral tooth). Data are expressed as the median. The horizontal resorption ratio of alveolar bone was 49.94 %, 31.5 %, and 24.46 %. The difference in alveolar bone height was 0.78 mm. The vertical resorption ratio was 7.78 %. The resorption did not differ significantly between sexes and was not significantly affected by tooth positions.

Conclusions: In the studied East Asian population, significant horizontal and vertical alveolar bone resorption occurs after natural healing of maxillary incisor extraction for 3 months. The closer to the alveolar ridge crest, the more significant the horizontal resorption, resulting in an "inverted triangle" shape residual alveolar bone.

References
1.
Tan W, Wong T, Wong M, Lang N . A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 23 Suppl 5:1-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02375.x. View

2.
Porto O, de Freitas Silva B, Silva J, Estrela C, Alencar A, Bueno M . CBCT assessment of bone thickness in maxillary and mandibular teeth: an anatomic study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2020; 28:e20190148. PMC: 6999116. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0148. View

3.
Zhou Y, Si M, Liu Y, Wu M . Likelihood of needing facial bone augmentation in the anterior maxilla of Chinese Asians: A cone beam computed tomography virtual implant study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(3):503-509. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12787. View

4.
Pietrokovski J, MASSLER M . Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent. 1967; 17(1):21-7. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(67)90046-7. View

5.
Iasella J, Greenwell H, Miller R, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra A . Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol. 2003; 74(7):990-9. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.7.990. View