Prognostic Factors for Return to Work in Patients Affected by Chronic Low Back Pain: a Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Musculoskelet Surg

Date 2024 Jun 12

PMID 38864993

Authors

F Russo

G F Papalia

L A Diaz Balzani

G Stelitano

B Zampogna

L Fontana

G Vadala

S Iavicoli

R Papalia

V Denaro

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (LBP) represents a leading cause of absenteeism from work. An accurate knowledge of complex interactions is essential in understanding the difficulties of return to work (RTW) experienced by workers affected by chronic LBP. This study aims to identify factors related to chronic LBP, the worker, and the psycho-social environment that could predict and influence the duration of an episode of sick leave due to chronic LBP.Studies reporting the relation between prognostic factors and absenteeism from work in patients with LBP were included. The selected studies were grouped by prognostic factors. The results were measured in absolute terms, relative terms, survival curve, or duration of sick leave. The level of evidence was defined by examining the quality and the appropriateness of findings across studies in terms of significance and direction of relationship for each prognostic factor.A total of 20 studies were included. Prognostic factors were classified in clinical, psycho-social, and social workplace, reaching a total of 31 constructs. Global conditions with less favorable repercussions on worker's lives resulted in a delay in time to RTW. Older age, female, higher pain or disability, depression, higher physical work demands, and abuse of smoke and alcohol have shown strong level of evidence for negative outcomes.High global health well-being, great socioeconomic status, and good mental health conditions are decisive in RTW outcomes. Interventions that aim at RTW of employee's sick-listed with LBP should focus on psycho-social aspects, health behaviors, and workplace characteristics.

Citing Articles

Effects of Supervised Rehabilitation on Psychosocial and Participation-Related Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Scandelli F, De Leo D, Marino G, De Martino E, Cannizzaro D, Adamo P J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685705 PMC: 11642663. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237246.

References

Serranheira F, Sousa-Uva M, Heranz F, Kovacs F, Sousa-Uva A . Low Back Pain (LBP), work and absenteeism. Work. 2020; 65(2):463-469. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-203073. View

Jensen O, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Jensen C, Nielsen C . Prediction model for unsuccessful return to work after hospital-based intervention in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013; 14:140. PMC: 3663778. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-140. View

Besen E, Young A, Shaw W . Returning to work following low back pain: towards a model of individual psychosocial factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2014; 25(1):25-37. PMC: 4333236. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9522-9. View

van der Giezen A, Bouter L, Nijhuis F . Prediction of return-to-work of low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months. Pain. 2000; 87(3):285-294. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00292-X. View

Storheim K, Brox J, Holm I, Bo K . Predictors of return to work in patients sick listed for sub-acute low back pain: a 12-month follow-up study. J Rehabil Med. 2005; 37(6):365-71. DOI: 10.1080/16501970510040344. View

Russo F, Papalia G, Vadala G, Fontana L, Iavicoli S, Papalia R . The Effects of Workplace Interventions on Low Back Pain in Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(23). PMC: 8657220. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312614. View

Luiz Carregaro R, Tottoli C, da Silva Rodrigues D, Bosmans J, Silva E, van Tulder M . Low back pain should be considered a health and research priority in Brazil: Lost productivity and healthcare costs between 2012 to 2016. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0230902. PMC: 7112211. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230902. View

Alexopoulos E, Konstantinou E, Bakoyannis G, Tanagra D, Burdorf A . Risk factors for sickness absence due to low back pain and prognostic factors for return to work in a cohort of shipyard workers. Eur Spine J. 2008; 17(9):1185-92. PMC: 2527417. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0711-0. View

Macias-Toronjo I, Sanchez-Ramos J, Rojas-Ocana M, Garcia-Navarro E . Influence of Psychosocial and Sociodemographic Variables on Sickness Leave and Disability in Patients with Work-Related Neck and Low Back Pain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(16). PMC: 7491198. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17165966. View

10.

Gross D, Battie M, Cassidy J . The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: part 1: timely return to work. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(8):914-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00019. View

11.

Fritz J, Wainner R, Hicks G . The use of nonorganic signs and symptoms as a screening tool for return-to-work in patients with acute low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(15):1925-31. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200008010-00010. View

12.

Steenstra I, Verbeek J, Heymans M, Bongers P . Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62(12):851-60. PMC: 1740930. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.015842. View

13.

Vendrig A . Prognostic factors and treatment-related changes associated with return to work in the multimodal treatment of chronic back pain. J Behav Med. 1999; 22(3):217-32. DOI: 10.1023/a:1018716406511. View

14.

Hansson T, Hansson E . The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 25(23):3055-64. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00013. View

15.

Gauthier N, Sullivan M, Adams H, Stanish W, Thibault P . Investigating risk factors for chronicity: the importance of distinguishing between return-to-work status and self-report measures of disability. J Occup Environ Med. 2006; 48(3):312-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.jom.0000184870.81120.49. View

16.

Anema J, Cuelenaere B, van der Beek A, Knol D, de Vet H, van Mechelen W . The effectiveness of ergonomic interventions on return-to-work after low back pain; a prospective two year cohort study in six countries on low back pain patients sicklisted for 3-4 months. Occup Environ Med. 2004; 61(4):289-94. PMC: 1740746. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2002.006460. View

17.

Cancelliere C, Donovan J, Stochkendahl M, Biscardi M, Ammendolia C, Myburgh C . Factors affecting return to work after injury or illness: best evidence synthesis of systematic reviews. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016; 24(1):32. PMC: 5015229. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-016-0113-z. View

18.

Persechino B, Fontana L, Buresti G, Rondinone B, Laurano P, Imbriani M . Professional activity, information demands, training and updating needs of occupational medicine physicians in Italy: National survey. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2016; 29(5):837-58. DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00736. View

19.

Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J . Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(6):299. PMC: 7186678. DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.175. View

20.

Rashid M, Kristofferzon M, Nilsson A, Heiden M . Factors associated with return to work among people on work absence due to long-term neck or back pain: a narrative systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(6):e014939. PMC: 5734441. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014939. View