» Articles » PMID: 38864904

Red Cell Distribution Width and Prognosis in Myelofibrosis Patients Treated with Ruxolitinib

Overview
Journal Ann Hematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2024 Jun 12
PMID 38864904
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We evaluated RDW in a single-center series of 61 consecutive patients with primary and secondary MF at diagnosis and during treatment with ruxolitinib (RUX) and examined any possible prognostic impact. Elevated RDW values were present in all but 4 patients at diagnosis with a median RDW of 18.9%. RDW was higher in subjects with palpable splenomegaly (p = 0.02), higher ferritin, as well as among those cases who did not receive any cytoreduction before RUX (p = 0.04). Interestingly, higher RDW at diagnosis also correlated with a shorter time from MF diagnosis to RUX start (-4.1 months per one RDW unit; p = 0.03). We observed a modest increase (< 1%) in RDW during the first 6 months of RUX treatment. In a multivariable random-intercept model that considered all time points and contained the covariates time and RUX dose, we also observed a clear decrease in RDW with increasing hemoglobin (Hb) during RUX (slope: -0.4% per g/dL of Hb; p < 0.001). The median RDW at diagnosis of 18.9% was used as a cut-off to identify two subgroups of patients [Group 1: RDW 19.0-25.7%; Group 2: RDW 13.1-18.7%], showing a difference in mortality [Group 1 vs. 2: crude HR 2.88; p = 0.01]. Using continuous RDW at diagnosis, the crude HR was 1.21 per RDW unit (p = 0.002). In a Cox model adjusted for gender, age and Hb at diagnosis, the HR was 1.13 per RDW unit (p = 0.07). RDW may have prognostic significance at MF diagnosis and during RUX, helping in the rapid detection of patients with poor prognosis.

Citing Articles

Red Blood Cell Distribution Width May Predict Drug-Induced Anemia and Prognosis in Patients Affected by Primary/Secondary Myelofibrosis Treated with Ruxolitinib.

Lagana A, Scalzulli E, Carmosino I, Bisegna M, Martelli M, Breccia M Oncol Ther. 2025; 13(1):165-183.

PMID: 39821749 PMC: 11880497. DOI: 10.1007/s40487-024-00322-2.

References
1.
Passamonti F, Mora B . Myelofibrosis. Blood. 2022; 141(16):1954-1970. PMC: 10646775. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2022017423. View

2.
Simel D, DeLong E, Feussner J, Weinberg J, Crawford J . Erythrocyte anisocytosis. Visual inspection of blood films vs automated analysis of red blood cell distribution width. Arch Intern Med. 1988; 148(4):822-4. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.148.4.822. View

3.
Felker G, Allen L, Pocock S, Shaw L, McMurray J, Pfeffer M . Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(1):40-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.067. View

4.
Seretis C, Seretis F, Lagoudianakis E, Gemenetzis G, Salemis N . Is red cell distribution width a novel biomarker of breast cancer activity? Data from a pilot study. J Clin Med Res. 2013; 5(2):121-6. PMC: 3601498. DOI: 10.4021/jocmr1214w. View

5.
Perisa V, Zibar L, Sincic-Petricevic J, Knezovic A, Perisa I, Barbic J . Red blood cell distribution width as a simple negative prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study. Croat Med J. 2015; 56(4):334-43. PMC: 4576747. DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2015.56.334. View