» Articles » PMID: 38863425

Dexterous Manipulation: Differential Sensitivity of Manipulation and Grasp Forces to Task Requirements

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2024 Jun 12
PMID 38863425
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How humans coordinate digit forces to perform dexterous manipulation is not well understood. This gap is due to the use of tasks devoid of dexterity requirements and/or the use of analytical techniques that cannot isolate the roles that digit forces play in preventing object slip and controlling object position and orientation (pose). In our recent work, we used a dexterous manipulation task and decomposed digit forces into , the internal force that prevents object slip, and , the force responsible for object pose control. Unlike , was modulated from object lift onset to hold, suggesting their different sensitivity to sensory feedback acquired during object lift. However, the extent to which and can be controlled independently remains to be determined. Importantly, how and change as a function of object property is mathematically indeterminate and therefore requires active modulation. To address this gap, we systematically changed either object mass or external torque. The normal component responsible for object orientation control was modulated to changes in object torque but not mass. In contrast, was distinctly modulated to changes in object mass and torque. These findings point to a differential sensitivity of and to task requirements and provide novel insights into the neural control of dexterous manipulation. Importantly, our results indicate that the proposed digit force decomposition has the potential to capture important differences in how sensory inputs are processed and integrated to simultaneously ensure grasp stability and dexterous object pose control. Successful dexterous object manipulation requires simultaneous prevention of object slip and object pose control. How these two task goals are attained can be investigated by decomposing digit forces into grasp and manipulation forces, respectively. We found that these forces were characterized by differential sensitivity to changes in object properties (mass and torque). This finding suggests the involvement of distinct sensorimotor mechanisms that, combined, simultaneously ensure grasp stability and dexterous control of object pose.

References
1.
Cremers J, Klugkist I . One Direction? A Tutorial for Circular Data Analysis Using R With Examples in Cognitive Psychology. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2040. PMC: 6218623. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02040. View

2.
Cohen R, Rosenbaum D . Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Exp Brain Res. 2004; 157(4):486-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1862-9. View

3.
Coats R, Bingham G, Mon-Williams M . Calibrating grasp size and reach distance: interactions reveal integral organization of reaching-to-grasp movements. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 189(2):211-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1418-5. View

4.
Reilmann R, Gordon A, Henningsen H . Initiation and development of fingertip forces during whole-hand grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2001; 140(4):443-52. DOI: 10.1007/s002210100838. View

5.
Johansson R, Westling G . Signals in tactile afferents from the fingers eliciting adaptive motor responses during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1987; 66(1):141-54. DOI: 10.1007/BF00236210. View