» Articles » PMID: 38861527

Barriers and Facilitators to Perioperative Smoking Cessation: A Scoping Review

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Jun 11
PMID 38861527
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Smoking cessation interventions are underutilized in the surgical setting. We aimed to systematically identify the barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation in the surgical setting.

Methods: Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework for scoping reviews, we searched 5 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) for quantitative or qualitative studies published in English (since 2000) evaluating barriers and facilitators to perioperative smoking cessation interventions. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and mapped to the theoretical domains framework (TDF).

Results: From 31 studies, we identified 23 unique barriers and 13 facilitators mapped to 11 of the 14 TDF domains. The barriers were within the domains of knowledge (e.g., inadequate knowledge of smoking cessation interventions) in 23 (74.2%) studies; environmental context and resources (e.g., lack of time to deliver smoking cessation interventions) in 19 (61.3%) studies; beliefs about capabilities (e.g., belief that patients are nervous about surgery/diagnosis) in 14 (45.2%) studies; and social/professional role and identity (e.g., surgeons do not believe it is their role to provide smoking cessation interventions) in 8 (25.8%) studies. Facilitators were mainly within the domains of environmental context and resources (e.g., provision of quit smoking advice as routine surgical care) in 15 (48.4%) studies, reinforcement (e.g., surgery itself as a motivator to kickstart quit attempts) in 8 (25.8%) studies, and skills (e.g., smoking cessation training and awareness of guidelines) in 5 (16.2%) studies.

Conclusion: The identified barriers and facilitators are actionable targets for future studies aimed at translating evidence informed smoking cessation interventions into practice in perioperative settings. More research is needed to evaluate how targeting these barriers and facilitators will impact smoking outcomes.

References
1.
Taniguchi C, Hibino F, Kawaguchi E, Maruguchi M, Tokunaga N, Saka H . Perceptions and practices of Japanese nurses regarding tobacco intervention for cancer patients. J Epidemiol. 2011; 21(5):391-7. PMC: 3899439. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20110008. View

2.
Yu C, Shi Y, Kadimpati S, Sheng Y, Jing J, Schroeder D . Perioperative smoking behavior of Chinese surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2013; 116(6):1238-46. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31828e5cf0. View

3.
Warner D, Klesges R, Dale L, Offord K, Schroeder D, Vickers K . Telephone quitlines to help surgical patients quit smoking patient and provider attitudes. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(6 Suppl):S486-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.032. View

4.
Webb A, Robertson N, Sparrow M . Smokers know little of their increased surgical risks and may quit on surgical advice. ANZ J Surg. 2013; 83(10):753-7. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12096. View

5.
McDonnell K, Hollen P, Heath J, Andrews J . Recruiting family dyads facing thoracic cancer surgery: Challenges and lessons learned from a smoking cessation intervention. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2015; 20:199-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2015.08.006. View