» Articles » PMID: 38861260

Peceleganan Spray for the Treatment of Skin Wound Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Importance: Peceleganan spray is a novel topical antimicrobial agent targeted for the treatment of skin wound infections. However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear.

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of peceleganan spray for the treatment of wound infections.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial recruited and followed up 570 adult patients diagnosed with secondary open wound infections from 37 hospitals in China from August 23, 2021, to July 16, 2022.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to 2 groups with a 2:1 allocation. One group received treatment with 2% peceleganan spray (n = 381) and the other with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD) cream (n = 189).

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary efficacy outcome was the clinical efficacy rate (the number of patients fulfilling the criteria for efficacy of the number of patients receiving the treatment) on the first day following the end of treatment (day 8). The secondary outcomes included the clinical efficacy rate on day 5 and the bacterial clearance rate (cases achieving negative bacteria cultures after treatment of all cases with positive bacteria cultures before treatment) on days 5 and 8. The safety outcomes included patients' vital signs, physical examination results, electrocardiographic findings, blood test results, and adverse reactions.

Results: Among the 570 patients randomized to 1 of the 2 groups, 375 (98.4%) in the 2% peceleganan treatment group and 183 (96.8%) in the 1% SSD control group completed the trial (n = 558). Of these, 361 (64.7%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 48.6 (15.3) years. The demographic characteristics were similar between groups. On day 8, clinical efficacy was achieved by 339 patients (90.4%) in the treatment group and 144 (78.7%) in the control group (P < .001). On day 5, clinical efficacy was achieved by 222 patients (59.2%) in the treatment group and 90 (49.2%) in the control group (P = .03). On day 8, bacterial clearance was achieved by 80 of 334 patients (24.0%) in the treatment group and in 75 of 163 (46.0%) in the control group (P < .001). On day 5, bacterial clearance was achieved by 55 of 334 patients (16.5%) in the treatment group and 50 of 163 (30.7%) in the control group (P < .001). The adverse events related to the application of peceleganan spray and SSD cream were similar.

Conclusions And Relevance: This randomized clinical trial found that peceleganan spray is a safe topical antimicrobial agent with a satisfactory clinical efficacy rate for the treatment of skin wound infections, while the effectiveness of bacterial clearance remains uncertain.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100047202.

Citing Articles

Antimicrobial peptide biological activity, delivery systems and clinical translation status and challenges.

Zheng S, Tu Y, Li B, Qu G, Li A, Peng X J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):292.

PMID: 40055730 PMC: 11887333. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-025-06321-9.


Genetic engineering, including genome editing, for enhancing broad-spectrum disease resistance in crops.

Han X, Li S, Zeng Q, Sun P, Wu D, Wu J Plant Commun. 2024; 6(2):101195.

PMID: 39568207 PMC: 11897464. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101195.


Dosage Error in Text, Figure, Tables, and Visual Abstract.

JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(10):e2446361.

PMID: 39422916 PMC: 11581546. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.46361.

References
1.
Lazzaro B, Zasloff M, Rolff J . Antimicrobial peptides: Application informed by evolution. Science. 2020; 368(6490). PMC: 8097767. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau5480. View

2.
Jenssen H, Hamill P, Hancock R . Peptide antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006; 19(3):491-511. PMC: 1539102. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00056-05. View

3.
Kucan J, ROBSON M, Heggers J, Ko F . Comparison of silver sulfadiazine, povidone-iodine and physiologic saline in the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1981; 29(5):232-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1981.tb01773.x. View

4.
James G, Swogger E, Wolcott R, deLancey Pulcini E, Secor P, Sestrich J . Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2007; 16(1):37-44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00321.x. View

5.
Thaarup I, Iversen A, Lichtenberg M, Bjarnsholt T, Jakobsen T . Biofilm Survival Strategies in Chronic Wounds. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(4). PMC: 9025119. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10040775. View