» Articles » PMID: 38861178

A Crossover Comparison of Patient Satisfaction with Two Teriparatide Regimens: Primary Results of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06)

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Jun 11
PMID 38861178
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare treatment satisfaction with two dosing regimens (two teriparatide [TPTD] self-injection systems) in osteoporosis patients at high risk of fracture.

Materials And Methods: In this open-label crossover randomized trial comparing self-injected once-daily (1/D)-TPTD with self-injected twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD, three satisfaction variables were evaluated by questionnaire for 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction and secondary endpoints were satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and with utility of the self-injection device. Changes in quality of life (QOL) assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension, pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and anthropometric parameters were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).

Results: The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups consisted of 180 (75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 179 (age: 75.5 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, no significant between-group difference in the persistence rate (79.4% vs 72.6% in the 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups, respectively), distributions of overall satisfaction scores, and satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05) were observed. However, several items of satisfaction with the utility of the injection device were significantly higher in the 2/W-TPTD group (p < 0.05). Statistical improvements from baseline values were observed in QOL and pain VAS in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported.

Conclusion: The between-group similarity of overall treatment satisfaction and effectiveness scores and between-group difference in satisfaction with the utility of the self-injection device was useful information for real-world treatment of osteoporosis. Both medication regimens were well tolerated.

Citing Articles

Randomized crossover comparison of two teriparatide self-injection regimens for primary osteoporosis: Interim report (end of 52-week treatment) of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial 06 (JOINT-06).

Soen S, Uemura Y, Tanaka S, Takeuchi Y, Endo N, Takada J J Bone Miner Metab. 2025; .

PMID: 39966121 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-025-01586-y.

References
1.
Compston J, McClung M, Leslie W . Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019; 393(10169):364-376. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3. View

2.
Reid I, Billington E . Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet. 2022; 399(10329):1080-1092. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02646-5. View

3.
McClung M, Rothman M, Lewiecki E, Hanley D, Harris S, Miller P . The role of osteoanabolic agents in the management of patients with osteoporosis. Postgrad Med. 2022; 134(6):541-551. DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2069582. View

4.
Cosman F . Anabolic Therapy and Optimal Treatment Sequences for Patients With Osteoporosis at High Risk for Fracture. Endocr Pract. 2021; 26(7):777-786. DOI: 10.4158/EP-2019-0596. View

5.
Rabenda V, Reginster J . Overcoming problems with adherence to osteoporosis medication. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010; 10(6):677-89. DOI: 10.1586/erp.10.76. View