» Articles » PMID: 38861035

Long-term Outcomes of ADEM-like and Tumefactive Presentations of CNS Demyelination: a Case-comparison Analysis

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Jun 11
PMID 38861035
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A minority of initial multiple sclerosis (MS) presentations clinically or radiologically resemble other central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) or tumefactive demyelination (atypical demyelination presentations). With the aim of better defining the long-term outcomes of this group we have performed a retrospective cohort comparison of atypical demyelination versus 'typical' MS presentations. Twenty-seven cases with atypical presentations (both first and subsequent demyelinating events) were identified and compared with typical MS cases. Disease features analysed included relapse rates, disability severity, whole brain and lesion volumes, lesion number and distribution. Atypical cases represented 3.9% of all MS cases. There was considerable overlap in the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of ADEM-like and tumefactive demyelination cases. ADEM-like cases tended to be younger but not significantly so. Atypical cases showed a trend towards higher peak expanded disability severity score (EDSS) score at the time of their atypical presentation. Motor, cranial nerve, cerebellar, cerebral and multifocal presentations were all more common in atypical cases, and less likely to present with optic neuritis. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white cell counts were higher in atypical cases (p = 0.002). One atypical case was associated with peripheral blood myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies, but subsequent clinical and radiological course was in keeping with MS. There was no difference in long-term clinical outcomes including annualised relapse rates (ARR), brain volume, lesion numbers or lesion distributions. Atypical demyelination cases were more likely to receive high potency disease modifying therapy early in the course of their illness. Despite the severity of initial illness, our cohort analysis suggests that atypical demyelination presentations do not confer a higher risk of long-term adverse outcomes.

References
1.
Gajofatto A, Calabrese M, Benedetti M, Monaco S . Clinical, MRI, and CSF markers of disability progression in multiple sclerosis. Dis Markers. 2013; 35(6):687-99. PMC: 3842089. DOI: 10.1155/2013/484959. View

2.
McDonald W, Compston A, Edan G, Goodkin D, Hartung H, Lublin F . Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2001; 50(1):121-7. DOI: 10.1002/ana.1032. View

3.
Eckstein C, Saidha S, Levy M . A differential diagnosis of central nervous system demyelination: beyond multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2011; 259(5):801-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-011-6240-5. View

4.
Pohl D, Alper G, Van Haren K, Kornberg A, Lucchinetti C, Tenembaum S . Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: Updates on an inflammatory CNS syndrome. Neurology. 2016; 87(9 Suppl 2):S38-45. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002825. View

5.
Karussis D . The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and the various related demyelinating syndromes: a critical review. J Autoimmun. 2014; 48-49:134-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2014.01.022. View