» Articles » PMID: 38858036

Child Pedestrian Safety Training in Virtual Reality: How Quickly Do Children Achieve Adult Functioning and What Individual Differences Impact Learning Efficiency?

Overview
Journal J Safety Res
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 Jun 10
PMID 38858036
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Pedestrian injuries represent a leading cause of child death globally. One prevention strategy is teaching children street-crossing skills. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a strategy to offer repeated street-crossing practice and overcome ethical barriers of training children in live traffic. This study addressed two questions pertinent to implementation of child pedestrian safety training within VR: (a) how much training do children require to achieve adult street-crossing competency, and (b) what individual differences might facilitate children to acquire that competency more efficiently?

Methods: Five hundred 7- and 8-year-olds were recruited. Children completed pedestrian safety training within VR for up to 25 thirty-minute training sessions until they achieved adult levels of mastery. At baseline, four cognitive-perceptual skills (visual memory, visual perception, processing speed, working memory) and parent-reported externalizing symptomatology were assessed.

Results: On average, children achieved adult pedestrian safety competency after 10.0 training sessions (SD = 4.8). Just one child (<1%) failed to achieve adult pedestrian functioning after 25 training sessions. In univariate analyses, boys took slightly longer than girls to achieve adult functioning, and visual memory, visual perception, processing speed, working memory, and fewer externalizing symptoms were all positively associated with shorter time to mastery. In a multivariable model, only child age was a statistically significant predictor.

Conclusion: Almost all participants achieved adult street-crossing skills competency through VR training, although they required about 10 sessions on average. Analysis of predictor variables confirmed that nearly all 7- and 8-year-olds are trainable.

Practical Application: Implementation of VR pedestrian safety training is recommended, but must be conducted cautiously to ensure children are not permitted to engage independently in traffic until they are assessed and demonstrate sufficient skills.

Citing Articles

Children's ability to estimate approaching vehicle time-to-arrival following training in a virtual pedestrian environment.

Schwebel D, Johnston A, McClure L Traffic Inj Prev. 2024; 25(7):919-924.

PMID: 39088758 PMC: 11415284. DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2352171.


Teaching children pedestrian safety in virtual reality via smartphone: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial.

Schwebel D, Johnston A, McDaniel D, Severson J, He Y, McClure L J Pediatr Psychol. 2024; 49(6):405-412.

PMID: 38637283 PMC: 11175590. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae020.

References
1.
Morgan C, Stager L, Schwebel D, Shen J . A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy of Virtual Reality Pedestrian Interventions to Teach Children How to Cross Streets Safely. J Pediatr Psychol. 2023; 48(12):1003-1020. PMC: 10733733. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsad058. View

2.
Schwebel D, Wu Y, Li P, Severson J, He Y, Xiang H . Featured Article: Evaluating Smartphone-Based Virtual Reality to Improve Chinese Schoolchildren's Pedestrian Safety: A Nonrandomized Trial. J Pediatr Psychol. 2017; 43(5):473-484. PMC: 5961228. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx147. View

3.
Schwebel D, Davis A, ONeal E . Child Pedestrian Injury: A Review of Behavioral Risks and Preventive Strategies. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2012; 6(4):292-302. PMC: 3467946. DOI: 10.1177/0885066611404876. View

4.
Schwebel D, Combs T, Rodriguez D, Severson J, Sisiopiku V . Community-based pedestrian safety training in virtual reality: A pragmatic trial. Accid Anal Prev. 2015; 86:9-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.002. View

5.
Morrongiello B, Corbett M, Stewart J . Understanding Sex Differences in Children's Injury Risk as Pedestrians. J Pediatr Psychol. 2020; 45(10):1144-1152. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa072. View