» Articles » PMID: 38856981

Evaluating Integration of Letter Fragments Through Contrast and Spatially Targeted Masking

Overview
Journal J Vis
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 Jun 10
PMID 38856981
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to gain a better understanding of the visual mechanisms related to how integration of partial shape cues provides for recognition of the full shape. In each experiment, letters formed as outline contours were displayed as a sequence of adjacent segments (fragments), each visible during a 17-ms time frame. The first experiment varied the contrast of the fragments. There were substantial individual differences in contrast sensitivity, so stimulus displays in the masking experiments that followed were calibrated to the sensitivity of each participant. Masks were displayed either as patterns that filled the entire screen (full field) or as successive strips that were sliced from the pattern, each strip lying across the location of the letter fragment that had been shown a moment before. Contrast of masks were varied to be lighter or darker than the letter fragments. Full-field masks, whether light or dark, provided relatively little impairment of recognition, as was the case for mask strips that were lighter than the letter fragments. However, dark strip masks proved to be very effective, with the degree of recognition impairment becoming larger as mask contrast was increased. A final experiment found the strip masks to be most effective when they overlapped the location where the letter fragments had been shown a moment before. They became progressively less effective with increased spatial separation from that location. Results are discussed with extensive reference to potential brain mechanisms for integrating shape cues.

References
1.
Sceniak M, Hawken M, Shapley R . Visual spatial characterization of macaque V1 neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2001; 85(5):1873-87. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2001.85.5.1873. View

2.
Bouma H . Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature. 1970; 226(5241):177-8. DOI: 10.1038/226177a0. View

3.
Chakravarthi R, Cavanagh P . Temporal properties of the polarity advantage effect in crowding. J Vis. 2008; 7(2):11.1-13. DOI: 10.1167/7.2.11. View

4.
Kahneman D, Treisman A, GIBBS B . The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information. Cogn Psychol. 1992; 24(2):175-219. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90007-o. View

5.
Kooi F, Toet A, Tripathy S, Levi D . The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spat Vis. 1994; 8(2):255-79. DOI: 10.1163/156856894x00350. View