» Articles » PMID: 38853386

The Glasgow Microenvironment Score: an Exemplar of Contemporary Biomarker Evolution in Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2024 Jun 10
PMID 38853386
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Significant variation in response to treatment and survival is evident among patients with similar stage disease. Molecular profiling has highlighted the heterogeneity of colorectal cancer but has had limited impact in daily clinical practice. Biomarkers with robust prognostic and therapeutic relevance are urgently required. Ideally, biomarkers would be derived from H&E sections used for routine pathological staging, have reliable sensitivity and specificity, and require minimal additional training. The biomarker targets would capture key pathological features with proven additive prognostic and clinical utility, such as the local inflammatory response and tumour microenvironment. The Glasgow Microenvironment Score (GMS), first described in 2014, combines assessment of peritumoural inflammation at the invasive margin with quantification of tumour stromal content. Using H&E sections, the Klintrup-Mäkinen (KM) grade is determined by qualitative morphological assessment of the peritumoural lymphocytic infiltrate at the invasive margin and tumour stroma percentage (TSP) calculated in a semi-quantitative manner as a percentage of stroma within the visible field. The resulting three prognostic categories have direct clinical relevance: GMS 0 denotes a tumour with a dense inflammatory infiltrate/high KM grade at the invasive margin and improved survival; GMS 1 represents weak inflammatory response and low TSP associated with intermediate survival; and GMS 2 tumours are typified by a weak inflammatory response, high TSP, and inferior survival. The prognostic capacity of the GMS has been widely validated while its potential to guide chemotherapy has been demonstrated in a large phase 3 trial cohort. Here, we detail its journey from conception through validation to clinical translation and outline the future for this promising and practical biomarker.

Citing Articles

Deep-learning enabled combined measurement of tumour cell density and tumour infiltrating lymphocyte density as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Westwood A, Wilson B, Laye J, Grabsch H, Mueller W, Magee D BJC Rep. 2025; 3(1):12.

PMID: 40033106 PMC: 11876445. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-025-00123-8.


Expression Analysis of VPS72 and Associated Biological Behaviors in Colon Cancer.

Cao J, Zhang H, Xie X, Wang W Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:3433-3442.

PMID: 39135633 PMC: 11318599. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S465064.

References
1.
Guinney J, Dienstmann R, Wang X, De Reynies A, Schlicker A, Soneson C . The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med. 2015; 21(11):1350-6. PMC: 4636487. DOI: 10.1038/nm.3967. View

2.
Nagtegaal I, Knijn N, Hugen N, Marshall H, Sugihara K, Tot T . Tumor Deposits in Colorectal Cancer: Improving the Value of Modern Staging-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 35(10):1119-1127. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.9091. View

3.
Park J, Richards C, McMillan D, Horgan P, Roxburgh C . The relationship between tumour stroma percentage, the tumour microenvironment and survival in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2014; 25(3):644-651. PMC: 4433525. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt593. View

4.
Park J, McMillan D, Powell A, Richards C, Horgan P, Edwards J . Evaluation of a tumor microenvironment-based prognostic score in primary operable colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 21(4):882-8. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1686. View

5.
Xu H, Cha Y, Clemenceau J, Choi J, Lee S, Kang J . Spatial analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in histological sections using deep learning techniques predicts survival in colorectal carcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res. 2022; 8(4):327-339. PMC: 9161341. DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.273. View