» Articles » PMID: 38851377

Ingestion of Polyethylene Terephthalate Microplastic Water Contaminants by Xenopus Laevis Tadpoles Negatively Affects Their Resistance to Ranavirus Infection and Antiviral Immunity

Overview
Journal Environ Pollut
Date 2024 Jun 8
PMID 38851377
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Small plastic debris (0.1 μm-5 mm) or microplastics (MPs) have become major pollutants of aquatic ecosystems worldwide and studies suggest that MPs exposure can pose serious threats to human and wildlife health. However, to date the potential biological impacts of MPs accumulating in low amount in tissues during early life remains unclear. Here, for a more realistic assessment, we have used environmentally representative, mildly weathered, polyethylene terephthalate microplastics (PET MPs), cryomilled (1-100 μm) and fluorescently labelled. We leveraged the amphibian Xenopus laevis tadpoles as an animal model to define the biodistribution of PET MPs and determine whether exposure to PET MPs induce perturbations of antiviral immunity. Exposure to PET MPs for 1-14 days resulted in detectable PET MPs biodistribution in intestine, gills, liver, and kidney as determined by fluorescence microscopy on whole mount tissues. PET MPs accumulation rate in tissues was further evaluated via a novel in situ enzymatic digestion and subsequent filtration using silicon nanomembranes, which shows that PET MPs rapidly accumulate in tadpole intestine, liver and kidneys and persist over a week. Longer exposure (1 month) of tadpoles to relatively low concentration of PET MPs (25 μg/ml) significantly increased susceptibility to viral infection and altered innate antiviral immunity without inducing overt inflammation. This study provides evidence that exposure to MPs negatively impact immune defenses of aquatic vertebrates.

References
1.
Lonnstedt O, Eklov P . RETRACTED: Environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic particles influence larval fish ecology. Science. 2016; 352(6290):1213-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad8828. View

2.
Ruthsatz K, Schwarz A, Gomez-Mestre I, Meyer R, Domscheit M, Bartels F . Life in plastic, it's not fantastic: Sublethal effects of polyethylene microplastics ingestion throughout amphibian metamorphosis. Sci Total Environ. 2023; 885:163779. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163779. View

3.
Rummel C, Loder M, Fricke N, Lang T, Griebeler E, Janke M . Plastic ingestion by pelagic and demersal fish from the North Sea and Baltic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2015; 102(1):134-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.043. View

4.
Maes T, Jessop R, Wellner N, Haupt K, Mayes A . A rapid-screening approach to detect and quantify microplastics based on fluorescent tagging with Nile Red. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:44501. PMC: 5353725. DOI: 10.1038/srep44501. View

5.
Eriksen M, Lebreton L, Carson H, Thiel M, Moore C, Borerro J . Plastic Pollution in the World's Oceans: More than 5 Trillion Plastic Pieces Weighing over 250,000 Tons Afloat at Sea. PLoS One. 2014; 9(12):e111913. PMC: 4262196. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111913. View