» Articles » PMID: 38849805

Chemical Compositions of Eucalyptus Sp. Essential Oils and the Evaluation of Their Combinations As a Promising Treatment Against Ear Bacterial Infections

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2024 Jun 7
PMID 38849805
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The chemical composition and biological activities of Eucalyptus essential oils (EOs) have been documented in numerous studies against multiple infectious diseases. The antibacterial activity of individual Eucalyptus EOs against strains that cause ear infections was investigated in our previous study. The study's antibacterial activity was promising, which prompted us to explore this activity further with EO blends.

Methods: We tested 15 combinations (9 binary combinations and 6 combinations of binary combinations) of Eucalyptus EOs extracted by hydrodistillation from eight Tunisian Eucalyptus species dried leaves against six bacterial strains responsible for ear infections: three bacterial isolates (Haemophilus influenzae, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and three reference bacteria strains (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ATTC 9027; Staphylococcus aureus, ATCC 6538; and Escherichia coli, ATCC 8739). The EOs were analyzed using GC/FID and GC/MS. The major compounds, as well as all values obtained from the bacterial growth inhibition assay, were utilized for statistical analysis.

Results: The antibacterial activity of the EO blends exhibited significant variation within Eucalyptus species, bacterial strains, and the applied methods. Principal component analysis (PCA) and hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), based on the diameters of the inhibition zone, facilitated the identification of two major groups and ten subgroups based on the level of antibacterial activity. The highest antibacterial activity was observed for the mixture of EOs extracted from E. panctata, E. accedens, and E. cladoclayx (paac) as well as E. panctata, E. wandoo, E. accedens, and E. cladoclayx (pwac) using the disc diffusion method. Additionally, significant activity was noted with EOs extracted from E. panctata, E. wandoo (pw) and E. panctata, E. accedens (pa) using the broth microdilution method.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that certain EO combinations (paac, pwac, pw, and pa) could be considered as potential alternative treatment for ear infections due to their demonstrated highly promising antibacterial activities.

References
1.
Pandey A, Kumar P, Singh P, Tripathi N, Bajpai V . Essential Oils: Sources of Antimicrobials and Food Preservatives. Front Microbiol. 2017; 7:2161. PMC: 5238431. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02161. View

2.
Hailu D, Mekonnen D, Derbie A, Mulu W, Abera B . Pathogenic bacteria profile and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of ear infection at Bahir Dar Regional Health Research Laboratory Center, Ethiopia. Springerplus. 2016; 5:466. PMC: 4833760. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2123-7. View

3.
Winnett V, Sirdaarta J, White A, Clarke F, Cock I . Inhibition of Klebsiella pneumoniae growth by selected Australian plants: natural approaches for the prevention and management of ankylosing spondylitis. Inflammopharmacology. 2017; 25(2):223-235. DOI: 10.1007/s10787-017-0328-1. View

4.
Bhat A, Ahangar A . Methods for detecting chemical-chemical interaction in toxicology. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2009; 17(8):441-50. DOI: 10.1080/15376510601177654. View

5.
Fandino I, Fernandez-Turren G, Ferret A, Moya D, Castillejos L, Calsamiglia S . Exploring Additive, Synergistic or Antagonistic Effects of Natural Plant Extracts on In Vitro Beef Feedlot-Type Rumen Microbial Fermentation Conditions. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(1). PMC: 7022539. DOI: 10.3390/ani10010173. View