» Articles » PMID: 38849504

Meta-analysis Reveals the Effects of Microbial Inoculants on the Biomass and Diversity of Soil Microbial Communities

Overview
Journal Nat Ecol Evol
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Jun 7
PMID 38849504
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Microbial inoculation involves transplanting microorganisms from their natural habitat to new plants or soils to improve plant performance, and it is being increasingly used in agriculture and ecological restoration. However, microbial inoculants can invade and alter the composition of native microbial communities; thus, a comprehensive analysis is urgently needed to understand the overall impact of microbial inoculants on the biomass, diversity, structure and network complexity of native communities. Here we provide a meta-analysis of 335 studies revealing a positive effect of microbial inoculants on soil microbial biomass. This positive effect was weakened by environmental stress and enhanced by the use of fertilizers and native inoculants. Although microbial inoculants did not alter microbial diversity, they induced major changes in the structure and bacterial composition of soil microbial communities, reducing the complexity of bacterial networks and increasing network stability. Finally, higher initial levels of soil nutrients amplified the positive impact of microbial inoculants on fungal biomass, actinobacterial biomass, microbial biomass carbon and microbial biomass nitrogen. Together, our results highlight the positive effects of microbial inoculants on soil microbial biomass, emphasizing the benefits of native inoculants and the important regulatory roles of soil nutrient levels and environmental stress.

Citing Articles

Bacterial Supplements Significantly Improve the Growth Rate of Cultured Asparagopsis armata.

Li J, Alperstein L, Tatsumi M, de Nys R, Nappi J, Egan S Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2025; 27(2):65.

PMID: 40085266 DOI: 10.1007/s10126-025-10440-1.


Soil microbiome interventions for carbon sequestration and climate mitigation.

Beattie G, Edlund A, Esiobu N, Gilbert J, Nicolaisen M, Jansson J mSystems. 2024; 10(1):e0112924.

PMID: 39692482 PMC: 11748500. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.01129-24.

References
1.
Kaminsky L, Trexler R, Malik R, Hockett K, Bell T . The Inherent Conflicts in Developing Soil Microbial Inoculants. Trends Biotechnol. 2018; 37(2):140-151. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.011. View

2.
Jack C, Petipas R, Cheeke T, Rowland J, Friesen M . Microbial Inoculants: Silver Bullet or Microbial Jurassic Park?. Trends Microbiol. 2020; 29(4):299-308. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2020.11.006. View

3.
Haskett T, Tkacz A, Poole P . Engineering rhizobacteria for sustainable agriculture. ISME J. 2020; 15(4):949-964. PMC: 8114929. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-00835-4. View

4.
Mallon C, van Elsas J, Falcao Salles J . Microbial invasions: the process, patterns, and mechanisms. Trends Microbiol. 2015; 23(11):719-729. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.07.013. View

5.
Singh J, Gupta V . Soil microbial biomass: A key soil driver in management of ecosystem functioning. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 634:497-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.373. View