» Articles » PMID: 38848350

Risk Factors Affecting Spinal Fusion: A Meta-analysis of 39 Cohort Studies

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2024 Jun 7
PMID 38848350
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We performed a meta-analysis to identify risk factors affecting spinal fusion.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 6, 2023, for articles that report risk factors affecting spinal fusion. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed-effects models for each factor for which the interstudy heterogeneity I2 was < 50%, while random-effects models were used when the interstudy heterogeneity I2 was ≥ 50%. Using sample size, Egger's P value, and heterogeneity across studies as criteria, we categorized the quality of evidence from observational studies as high-quality (Class I), moderate-quality (Class II or III), or low-quality (Class IV). Furthermore, the trim-and-fill procedure and leave-one-out protocol were conducted to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity and verify result stability.

Results: Of the 1,257 citations screened, 39 unique cohort studies comprising 7,145 patients were included in the data synthesis. High-quality (Class I) evidence showed that patients with a smoking habit (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.21) and without the use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 3.33 to 5.86) were at higher risk for fusion failure. Moderate-quality (Class II or III) evidence showed that fusion failure was significantly associated with vitamin D deficiency (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.24 to 4.90), diabetes (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.59 to 7.36), allograft (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.96), conventional pedicle screw (CPS) fixation (OR, 4.77; 95% CI, 2.23 to 10.20) and posterolateral fusion (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.25 to 10.49).

Conclusions: Conspicuous risk factors affecting spinal fusion include three patient-related risk factors (smoking, vitamin D deficiency, and diabetes) and four surgery-related risk factors (without the use of BMP-2, allograft, CPS fixation, and posterolateral fusion). These findings may help clinicians strengthen awareness for early intervention in patients at high risk of developing fusion failure.

References
1.
Wang H, Meng Y, Liu H, Wang X, Hong Y . The impact of smoking on outcomes following anterior cervical fusion-nonfusion hybrid surgery: a retrospective single-center cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1):612. PMC: 8272305. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04501-4. View

2.
Mundis G, Eastlack R, Moazzaz P, Turner A, Cornwall G . Contribution of Round vs. Rectangular Expandable Cage Endcaps to Spinal Stability in a Cadaveric Corpectomy Model. Int J Spine Surg. 2015; 9:53. PMC: 4657610. DOI: 10.14444/2053. View

3.
Niu S, Anastasio A, Faraj R, Rhee J . Evaluation of Heterotopic Ossification After Using Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Computed Tomography Review of 996 Disc Levels. Global Spine J. 2020; 10(3):280-285. PMC: 7160810. DOI: 10.1177/2192568219846074. View

4.
Tavares W, Araujo de Franca S, Paiva W, Teixeira M . A systematic review and meta-analysis of fusion rate enhancements and bone graft options for spine surgery. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):7546. PMC: 9085837. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11551-8. View

5.
Peters J, Sutton A, Jones D, Abrams K, Rushton L . Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006; 295(6):676-80. DOI: 10.1001/jama.295.6.676. View