» Articles » PMID: 38846269

Addressing the Unmet Clinical Need for Low-volume Assays in Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer

Overview
Date 2024 Jun 7
PMID 38846269
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The incidental detection of pancreatic cysts, an opportunity for the early detection of pancreatic cancer, is increasing, owing to an aging population and improvements in imaging technology. The classification of pancreatic cystic precursors currently relies on imaging and cyst fluid evaluations, including cytology and protein and genomic analyses. However, there are persistent limitations that obstruct the accuracy and quality of information for clinicians, including the limited volume of the complex, often acellular, and proteinaceous milieu that comprises pancreatic cyst fluid. The constraints of currently available clinical assays lead clinicians to the subjective and inconsistent application of diagnostic tools, which can contribute to unnecessary surgery and missed pancreatic cancers. Herein, we describe the pathway toward pancreatic cyst classification and diagnosis, the volume requirements for several clinically available diagnostic tools, and some analytical and diagnostic limitations for each assay. We then discuss current and future work on novel markers and methods, and how to expand the utility of clinical pancreatic cyst fluid samples. Results of ongoing studies applying SERS as a detection mode suggest that 50 μL of pancreatic cyst fluid is more than sufficient to accurately rule out non-mucinous pancreatic cysts with no malignant potential from further evaluation. This process is expected to leave sufficient fluid to analyze a follow-up, rule-in panel of markers currently in development that can stratify grades of dysplasia in mucinous pancreatic cysts and improve clinical decision-making.

References
1.
Pontious C, Kaul S, Hong M, Hart P, Krishna S, Lara L . Cathepsin E expression and activity: Role in the detection and treatment of pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2019; 19(7):951-956. PMC: 6829043. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.09.009. View

2.
de Jong K, Poley J, van Hooft J, Visser M, Bruno M, Fockens P . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cystic lesions provides inadequate material for cytology and laboratory analysis: initial results from a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2011; 43(7):585-90. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256440. View

3.
Cho S, Song T, Seo D, Oh D, Park D, Lee S . Efficacy and safety of EUS-guided through-the-needle microforceps biopsy sampling in categorizing the type of pancreatic cystic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021; 95(2):299-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.09.035. View

4.
Kovacevic B, Klausen P, Rift C, Toxvaerd A, Grossjohann H, Karstensen J . Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle microbiopsy in patients with pancreatic cysts. Endoscopy. 2020; 53(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1055/a-1214-6043. View

5.
Suresh V, Byers K, Rajesh U, Caiazza F, Zhu G, Craik C . Translation of a Protease Turnover Assay for Clinical Discrimination of Mucinous Pancreatic Cysts. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(6). PMC: 9222202. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12061343. View