» Articles » PMID: 38844884

The Naples Prognostic Score Serves As a Predictor and Prognostic Indicator for Cancer Survivors in the Community

Overview
Journal BMC Cancer
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Jun 6
PMID 38844884
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Inflammation, malnutrition, and cancer are intricately interconnected. Despite this, only a few studies have delved into the relationship between inflammatory malnutrition and the risk of death among cancer survivors. This study aimed to specifically investigate the association between the categorically defined Naples prognostic score (NPS) and the prognosis of cancer survivors.

Methods: Data from 42,582 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999-2018) were subjected to analysis. Naples prognostic scores (NPS) were computed based on serum albumin (ALB), total cholesterol (TC), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), and participants were stratified into three groups accordingly. Cancer status was ascertained through a self-administered questionnaire, while mortality data were sourced from the National Death Index up to December 31, 2019. Multiple logistic regression was employed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) between NPS and cancer prevalence within the U.S. community population. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the Log-rank test were utilized to compare survival disparities among the three groups. Additionally, Cox proportional regression was utilized to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% CI.

Results: The incidence of cancers was 9.86%. Among the participants, 8140 individuals (19.1%) were classified into Group 0 (NPS 0), 29,433 participants (69.1%) into Group 1 (NPS 1 or 2), and 5009 participants (11.8%) into Group 2 (NPS 3 or 4). After adjusting for confounding factors, the cancer prevalence for the highest NPS score yielded an odds ratio (OR) of 1.64 (95% CI: 1.36, 1.97) (P() < 0.05). In comparison to cancer survivors in Group 0, those with the highest NPS had adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of 2.57 (95% CI: 1.73, 3.84) for all-cause mortality, 3.44 (95% CI: 1.64, 7.21) for cardiovascular mortality, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.01, 2.56) for cancer mortality, and 3.15 (95% CI: 1.74, 5.69) for other causes of mortality (All P() < 0.05). These associations remained consistent when stratified by age, sex, race, and body mass index.

Conclusions: This study indicates that the Naples prognostic score (NPS), serving as a novel prognostic metric integrating inflammation and nutritional status, is closely linked to cancer prognosis within the general population.

Citing Articles

Association of Naples Prognostic Score with anemia in cancer survivors: a study based on NHANES database.

Wu Q, Cai J, Li J, He G, Yang X, Chen L Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1461962.

PMID: 40018412 PMC: 11865023. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1461962.


Evaluation of NAPLES Prognostic Score to Predict Long-Term Mortality in Patients with Pulmonary Embolism.

Kaya S, Tekin V Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941245 PMC: 11817186. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030315.


Development of a Prognostic Nomogram Incorporating the Naples Prognostic Score for Postoperative Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients.

Xu X, Cheng H J Inflamm Res. 2025; 18():325-345.

PMID: 39802503 PMC: 11724622. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S500518.


Prognostic value of the Naples Prognostic Score in adult chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: NHANES 2005-2018.

Kang Y, Tan Y, Tie Y, Zhang Y, Cui C, Zhao Y Front Nutr. 2024; 11:1502266.

PMID: 39737157 PMC: 11682890. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1502266.

References
1.
Zaorsky N, Churilla T, Egleston B, Fisher S, Ridge J, Horwitz E . Causes of death among cancer patients. Ann Oncol. 2016; 28(2):400-407. PMC: 5834100. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw604. View

2.
Yao J, Chen X, Meng F, Cao H, Shu X . Combined influence of nutritional and inflammatory status and depressive symptoms on mortality among US cancer survivors: Findings from the NHANES. Brain Behav Immun. 2023; 115:109-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2023.10.002. View

3.
Flegal K, Kruszon-Moran D, Carroll M, Fryar C, Ogden C . Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014. JAMA. 2016; 315(21):2284-91. PMC: 11197437. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.6458. View

4.
Nost T, Alcala K, Urbarova I, Smith Byrne K, Guida F, Sandanger T . Systemic inflammation markers and cancer incidence in the UK Biobank. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021; 36(8):841-848. PMC: 8416852. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00752-6. View

5.
Guy Jr G, Ekwueme D, Yabroff K, Dowling E, Li C, Rodriguez J . Economic burden of cancer survivorship among adults in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(30):3749-57. PMC: 3795887. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.1241. View