» Articles » PMID: 38842281

Door-to-Needle Time for Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Neurological Outcomes in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Nationwide Study

Overview
Date 2024 Jun 6
PMID 38842281
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is an option for refractory cardiac arrest, and immediate initiation after indication is recommended. However, the practical goals of ECPR preparation (such as the door-to-needle time) remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the association between the door-to-needle time and neurological outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Methods And Results: This is a post hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter study on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with ECPR at 36 institutions between 2013 and 2018 (SAVE-J [Study of Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan] II study). Adult patients without hypothermia (≥32 °C) in whom circulation was not returned at ECPR initiation were included. The probability of favorable neurological function at 30 days (defined as Cerebral Performance Category ≤2) was estimated using a generalized estimating equations model, in which institutional, patient, and treatment characteristics were adjusted. Estimated probabilities were then calculated according to the door-to-needle time with 3-minute increments, and a clinical threshold was assumed. Among 1298 patients eligible for this study, 136 (10.6%) had favorable neurological function. The estimated probability of favorable outcomes was highest in patients with 1 to 3 minutes of door-to-needle time (12.9% [11.4%-14.3%]) and remained at 9% to 10% until 27 to 30 minutes. Then, the probability dropped gradually with each 3-minute delay. A 30-minute threshold was assumed, and shorter door-to-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/low-flow time and fewer adverse events related to cannulation were observed in patients with door-to-needle time <30 minutes.

Conclusions: The probability of favorable functions after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest decreased as the door-to-needle time for ECPR was prolonged, with a rapid decline after 27 to 30 minutes.

Registration: URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000041577; Unique identifier: UMIN000036490.

Citing Articles

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-Where Do We Currently Stand?.

Ferrell B, Thomas J, Skendelas J, Uehara M, Sugiura T Biomedicines. 2025; 13(1).

PMID: 39857787 PMC: 11759854. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13010204.


ECMO in the Cardiac Catheterization Lab-Patient Selection Is Key.

Tracy W, Ferrell B, Skendelas J, Uehara M, Sugiura T J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39852290 PMC: 11765822. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12010012.

References
1.
Grossestreuer A, Abella B, Sheak K, Cinousis M, Perman S, Leary M . Inter-rater reliability of post-arrest cerebral performance category (CPC) scores. Resuscitation. 2016; 109:21-24. PMC: 5990009. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.006. View

2.
Bartos J, Carlson K, Carlson C, Raveendran G, John R, Aufderheide T . Surviving refractory out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest: Critical care and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management. Resuscitation. 2018; 132:47-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.08.030. View

3.
Abrams D, Garan A, Abdelbary A, Bacchetta M, Bartlett R, Beck J . Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults. Intensive Care Med. 2018; 44(6):717-729. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5064-5. View

4.
Brooks S, Anderson M, Bruder E, Daya M, Gaffney A, Otto C . Part 6: Alternative Techniques and Ancillary Devices for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2):S436-43. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000260. View

5.
Cheskes S, Drennan I . No flow time, bystander low flow time and EMS system response time: Are we looking at two sides of the same coin?. Resuscitation. 2021; 167:412-413. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.08.033. View