» Articles » PMID: 38841644

Thoracolumbar Fascia and Lumbar Muscle Stiffness in Athletes with A History of Hamstring Injury

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2024 Jun 6
PMID 38841644
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and lumbar muscle modulus in individuals with and without hamstring injury using shear wave elastography (SWE). Thirteen male soccer players without a previous hamstring injury and eleven players with a history of hamstring injury performed passive and active (submaximal) knee flexion efforts from 0, 45 and 90 angle of knee flexion as well as an active prone trunk extension test. The elastic modulus of the TLF, the erector spinae (ES) and the multifidus (MF) was measured using ultrasound SWE simultaneously with the surface electromyography (EMG) signal of the ES and MF. The TLF SWE modulus was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the injured group (range: 29.86 ± 8.58 to 66.57 ± 11.71 kPa) than in the uninjured group (range: 17.47 ± 9.37 to 47.03 ± 16.04 kPa). The ES and MF modulus ranged from 14.97 ± 4.10 to 66.57 ± 11.71 kPa in the injured group and it was significantly (p < .05) greater compared to the uninjured group (range: 11.65 ± 5.99 to 40.49 ± 12.35 kPa). TLF modulus was greater than ES and MF modulus (p < 0.05). Active modulus was greater during the prone trunk extension test compared to the knee flexion tests and it was greater in the knee flexion test at 0° than at 90° (p < 0.05). The muscle EMG was greater in the injured compared to the uninjured group in the passive tests only (p < 0.05). SWE modulus of the TLF and ES and MF was greater in soccer players with previous hamstring injury than uninjured players. Further research could establish whether exercises that target the paraspinal muscles and the lumbar fascia can assist in preventing individuals with a history of hamstring injury from sustaining a new injury.

Citing Articles

Fascia and Muscle Stiffness in Soccer Athletes with and Without Previous Hamstring Injury.

Kellis E, Kekelekis A, Drakonaki E J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39982288 PMC: 11843906. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk10010048.

References
1.
Schuermans J, Van Tiggelen D, Palmans T, Danneels L, Witvrouw E . Deviating running kinematics and hamstring injury susceptibility in male soccer players: Cause or consequence?. Gait Posture. 2017; 57:270-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.268. View

2.
Sherry M, Best T . A comparison of 2 rehabilitation programs in the treatment of acute hamstring strains. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2004; 34(3):116-25. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2004.34.3.116. View

3.
Ekstrand J, Bengtsson H, Walden M, Davison M, Khan K, Hagglund M . Hamstring injury rates have increased during recent seasons and now constitute 24% of all injuries in men's professional football: the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study from 2001/02 to 2021/22. Br J Sports Med. 2023; . PMC: 9985757. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105407. View

4.
van Wingerden J, Vleeming A, Buyruk H, Raissadat K . Stabilization of the sacroiliac joint in vivo: verification of muscular contribution to force closure of the pelvis. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(3):199-205. PMC: 3468133. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0575-2. View

5.
Nakamura M, Hasegawa S, Umegaki H, Nishishita S, Kobayashi T, Fujita K . The difference in passive tension applied to the muscles composing the hamstrings - Comparison among muscles using ultrasound shear wave elastography. Man Ther. 2016; 24:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.03.012. View