» Articles » PMID: 38841302

Atosiban Interacts with Growth Hormones As Adjuvants in Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2024 Jun 6
PMID 38841302
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the interaction between atosiban and growth hormone (GH) as adjuvants in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Method: A total of 11627 patients who underwent FET at Xiamen University Affiliated Chenggong Hospital between January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 482 patients received atosiban and 275 patients received GH. The interactions were estimated by comparing the odds ratio (OR) for pregnancy comparing patients with or without atosiban adjuvant in cohorts stratified according to the presence of GH use in either the overall cohort or a propensity score (PS) matched cohort. An interaction term (atosiban × GH) was introduced to a multivariate model to calculate the ratio of OR (ORR) adjusted for confounders.

Results: For all patients receiving atosiban administration, no obvious effect on pregnancy was observed in comparison with either matched or unmatched controls. However, when the patients were stratified according to GH administration, atosiban showed a significant association with clinical pregnancy in comparison with either matched or unmatched controls among patients with GH treatment with rate ratios (RR) of 1.32 (95%CI: 1.05,1.67) and 1.35 (95%CI: 1,1.82), respectively. On the other hand, however, the association was absent among patients without GH treatment. The adjusted ORRs in both matched and unmatched cohorts were 2.44 (95%CI: 1.07,5.84) and 1.95 (95%CI: 1.05, 3.49) respectively.

Conclusion: The combination use of atosiban and GH in FET cycles is potentially beneficial to the pregnancy. However, indications for the use of atosiban and GH may need further assessment.

References
1.
Tang C, Li Q, Chen F, Cai C, Dong Y, Wu Y . A randomized double blind comparison of atosiban in patients with recurrent implantation failure undergoing IVF treatment. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022; 20(1):124. PMC: 9389813. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-022-00999-y. View

2.
Sohlstrom A, Carlsson-Skwirut C, Bang P, Brismar K, Uvnas-Moberg K . Effects of oxytocin treatment early in pregnancy on fetal growth in ad libitum-fed and food-restricted rats. Pediatr Res. 1999; 46(3):339-44. DOI: 10.1203/00006450-199909000-00016. View

3.
Rombauts L, McMaster R, Motteram C, Fernando S . Risk of ectopic pregnancy is linked to endometrial thickness in a retrospective cohort study of 8120 assisted reproduction technology cycles. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(12):2846-52. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev249. View

4.
Altmae S, Mendoza-Tesarik R, Mendoza C, Mendoza N, Cucinelli F, Tesarik J . Effect of Growth Hormone on Uterine Receptivity in Women With Repeated Implantation Failure in an Oocyte Donation Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endocr Soc. 2018; 2(1):96-105. PMC: 5779111. DOI: 10.1210/js.2017-00359. View

5.
He Y, Wu H, He X, Xing Q, Zhou P, Cao Y . Administration of atosiban in patients with endometriosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a prospective, randomized study. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106(2):416-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.019. View