» Articles » PMID: 38839714

Peripheral Vision Contributes to Implicit Attentional Learning: Findings from the "mouse-eye" Paradigm

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2024 Jun 5
PMID 38839714
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The central visual field is essential for activities like reading and face recognition. However, the impact of peripheral vision loss on daily activities is profound. While the importance of central vision is well established, the contribution of peripheral vision to spatial attention is less clear. In this study, we introduced a "mouse-eye" method as an alternative to traditional gaze-contingent eye tracking. We found that even in tasks requiring central vision, peripheral vision contributes to implicit attentional learning. Participants searched for a T among Ls, with the T appearing more often in one visual quadrant. Earlier studies showed that participants' awareness of the T location probability was not essential for their ability to learn. When we limited the visible area around the mouse cursor, only participants aware of the target's location probability showed learning; those unaware did not. Adding placeholders in the periphery did not restore implicit attentional learning. A control experiment showed that when participants were allowed to see all items while searching and moving the mouse to reveal the target's color, both aware and unaware participants acquired location probability learning. Our results underscore the importance of peripheral vision in implicitly guided attention. Without peripheral vision, only explicit, but not implicit, attentional learning prevails.

References
1.
Chun M, Jiang Y . Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003; 29(2):224-34. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.224. View

2.
Eum B, Dolbier S, Rangel A . Peripheral Visual Information Halves Attentional Choice Biases. Psychol Sci. 2023; 34(9):984-998. DOI: 10.1177/09567976231184878. View

3.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(2):175-91. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193146. View

4.
Geng J, Behrmann M . Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychol Sci. 2002; 13(6):520-5. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00491. View

5.
Jiang Y, Sisk C . Habit-like attention. Curr Opin Psychol. 2018; 29:65-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.014. View