» Articles » PMID: 38837041

Artificial and Biological Supports Are Different for Pea Plants

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Jun 5
PMID 38837041
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies on the kinematics of pea plants' ascent and attach behavior have demonstrated that the signature of their movement varies depending on the kind of support. So far, these studies have been confined to artificial supports (e.g. wooden sticks). Little is known regarding the conditions under which pea plants could rely on biological supports (e.g. neighboring plants) for climbing toward the light. In this study, we capitalize on the 3D kinematic analysis of movement to ascertain whether pea plants scale their kinematics differently depending on whether they aim for artificial or biological support. Results suggest that biological support determines a smoother and more accurate behavior than that elicited by the artificial one. These results shed light on pea plants' ability to detect and classify the properties of objects and implement a movement plan attuned to the very nature of the support. We contend that such differences depend on the augmented multisensory experience elicited by the biological support.

Citing Articles

Novel perspectives on plant behavior.

Van Volkenburgh E, Brenner E Plant Signal Behav. 2024; 19(1):2419673.

PMID: 39495842 PMC: 11540076. DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2024.2419673.

References
1.
Bonato B, Simonetti V, Bulgheroni M, Wang Q, Guerra S, Quaggiotti S . Evidence of motor intentions in plants: A kinematical study. J Comp Psychol. 2023; 137(4):228-237. DOI: 10.1037/com0000351. View

2.
Castiello U . (Re)claiming plants in comparative psychology. J Comp Psychol. 2020; 135(1):127-141. DOI: 10.1037/com0000239. View

3.
Lanz F, Moret V, Rouiller E, Loquet G . Multisensory Integration in Non-Human Primates during a Sensory-Motor Task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:799. PMC: 3837444. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00799. View

4.
Bonato B, Wang Q, Guerra S, Simonetti V, Bulgheroni M, Quaggiotti S . intertwining as evidence of joint actions in pea plants. AoB Plants. 2024; 16(1):plad088. PMC: 10773780. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plad088. View

5.
Karban R, Shiojiri K, Huntzinger M, McCall A . Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication. Ecology. 2006; 87(4):922-30. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[922:drisva]2.0.co;2. View