» Articles » PMID: 38836005

Representative Bureaucracy Through Staff With Lived Experience: Peer Coproduction in the Field of Substance Use Disorder Treatment

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Jun 5
PMID 38836005
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study extends the representative bureaucracy literature by theorizing and empirically testing how staff sharing lived experience with service users can serve as user representatives in service provision processes (i.e., the peer coproduction mechanism). Using survey data from a representative sample of substance use disorder treatment clinics in the United States, we explore factors associated with descriptive representation (the presence of staff with firsthand experience of a substance use disorder in both frontline treatment and senior positions) and directors' perceptions of recovering staff's potential to serve as user representatives in individual care and organizational decision-making processes. Recovering staff accounted for a third of the field's workforce, but the majority of the clinics did not employ them in senior staff positions. Regression results suggest that organizational leaders' recognition of recovering staff's unique representation capacities may facilitate greater descriptive representation and grant meaningful organizational decision-making authority to recovering staff. Multiple research and practice implications are discussed.

Citing Articles

Factors that Influence Co-production among Student Interns, Consumers, and Providers of Social and Public Health Services: Implications for Interprofessional Collaboration and Training.

Park S, Pinto R Soc Work Public Health. 2021; 37(1):71-83.

PMID: 34488568 PMC: 8665028. DOI: 10.1080/19371918.2021.1974638.

References
1.
DAunno T, Friedmann P, Chen Q, Wilson D . Integration of Substance Abuse Treatment Organizations into Accountable Care Organizations: Results from a National Survey. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015; 40(4):797-819. PMC: 4704856. DOI: 10.1215/03616878-3150062. View

2.
Park S . Coproduction in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorder and Its Relationship to Clinics' Service Output Patterns. Soc Serv Rev. 2024; 94(3):607-645. PMC: 11142637. DOI: 10.1086/710706. View

3.
Humphreys K, Noke J, MOOS R . Recovering substance abuse staff members' beliefs about addiction. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996; 13(1):75-8. DOI: 10.1016/0740-5472(95)02019-5. View

4.
Pollack H, DAunno T . HIV testing and counseling in the nation's outpatient substance abuse treatment system, 1995-2005. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 38(4):307-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.12.004. View

5.
Reif S, George P, Braude L, Dougherty R, Daniels A, Ghose S . Residential treatment for individuals with substance use disorders: assessing the evidence. Psychiatr Serv. 2014; 65(3):301-12. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300242. View