» Articles » PMID: 38832228

Pay-for-performance and Low Back Pain with Interaction of Overwork: Findings from the Cross-sectional Korean Working Conditions Survey

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2024 Jun 4
PMID 38832228
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Pay-for-performance (PFP) is a type of incentive system where employees receive monetary rewards for meeting predefined standards. While previous research has investigated the relationship between PFP and health outcomes, the focus has primarily been on mental health. Few studies have explored the impact of PFP on specific physical symptoms like pain.

Methods: Data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS) was analyzed, encompassing 20,815 subjects with information on PFP and low back pain (LBP). The associations between types of base pay (BP) and PFP with LBP were examined using multivariate logistic regression models, taking into account a directed acyclic graph (DAG). The interaction of overtime work was further explored using stratified logistic regression models and the relative excess risk for interaction.

Results: The odds ratio (OR) for individuals receiving both BP and PFP was statistically significant at 1.19 (95% CI 1.04-1.35) compared to those with BP only. However, when the DAG approach was applied and necessary correction variables were adjusted, the statistical significance indicating a relationship between PFP and LBP vanished. In scenarios without PFP and with overtime work, the OR related to LBP was significant at 1.54 (95% CI 1.35-1.75). With the presence of PFP, the OR increased to 2.02 (95% CI 1.66-2.45).

Conclusion: Pay-for-performance may influence not just psychological symptoms but also LBP in workers, particularly in conjunction with overtime work. The impact of management practices related to overtime work on health outcomes warrants further emphasis in research.

References
1.
Tennant P, Murray E, Arnold K, Berrie L, Fox M, Gadd S . Use of directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to identify confounders in applied health research: review and recommendations. Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 50(2):620-632. PMC: 8128477. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyaa213. View

2.
Amagasa T, Nakayama T . Relationships Among Pay-for-Performance, Work Stressors, and Depression in Sales Workers: A Structural Equation Model Analysis. J Occup Environ Med. 2022; 64(12):1018-1024. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002627. View

3.
Kivimaki M, Jokela M, Nyberg S, Singh-Manoux A, Fransson E, Alfredsson L . Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603,838 individuals. Lancet. 2015; 386(10005):1739-46. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60295-1. View

4.
Kim Y, Rhee K, Oh M, Park J . The validity and reliability of the second korean working conditions survey. Saf Health Work. 2013; 4(2):111-6. PMC: 3732146. DOI: 10.1016/j.shaw.2013.05.001. View

5.
Lee H, Kim I, Kim H, Kawachi I . Association of long working hours with accidents and suicide mortality in Korea. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020; 46(5):480-487. PMC: 7737799. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.3890. View