Does Obesity and Varying Body Mass Index Affect the Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression? A Comparative Cohort Study

Overview

Journal Acta Neurochir (Wien)

Specialty Neurosurgery

Date 2024 Jun 3

PMID 38831229

Authors

Thomas E Olson

Alexander Upfill-Brown

Babapelumi Adejuyigbe

Nitin Bhatia

Yu-Po Lee

Sohaib Hashmi

Hao-Hua Wu

Hansen Bow

Cheol Wung Park

Dong Hwa Heo

Don Young Park

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic spine surgery has recently grown in popularity due to the potential benefits of reduced pain and faster recovery time as compared to open surgery. Biportal spinal endoscopy has been successfully applied to lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Obesity is associated with increased risk of complications in spine surgery. Few prior studies have investigated the impact of obesity and associated medical comorbidities with biportal spinal endoscopy.

Methods: This study was a prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed comparative cohort design. Patients were divided into cohorts of normal body weight (Bone Mass Index (BMI)18.0-24.9), overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9) and obese (BMI > 30.0) as defined by the World Health Organization (WHO). Patients underwent biportal spinal endoscopy by a single surgeon at a single institution for treatment of lumbar disc herniations and lumbar spinal stenosis. Demographic data, surgical complications, and patient-reported outcomes were analyzed. Statistics were calculated amongst treatment groups using analysis of variance and chi square where appropriate. Statistical significance was determined as p < 0.05.

Results: Eighty-four patients were followed. 26 (30.1%) were normal BMI, 35 (41.7%) were overweight and 23 (27.4%) were obese. Patients with increasing BMI had correspondingly greater American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores. There were no significant differences in VAS Back, VAS Leg, and ODI scores, or postoperative complications among the cohorts. There were no cases of surgical site infections in the cohort. All cohorts demonstrated significant improvement up to 1 year postoperatively.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that obesity is not a risk factor for increased perioperative complications with biportal spinal endoscopy and has similar clinical outcomes and safety profile as compared to patients with normal BMI. Biportal spinal endoscopy is a promising alternative to traditional techniques to treat common lumbar pathology.

References

Jackson 2nd K, DeVine J . The Effects of Obesity on Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Global Spine J. 2016; 6(4):394-400. PMC: 4868585. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1570750. View

Jiang J, Teng Y, Fan Z, Khan S, Xia Y . Does obesity affect the surgical outcome and complication rates of spinal surgery? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 472(3):968-75. PMC: 3916601. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3346-3. View

Wang T, Han C, Jiang H, Tian P . The Effect of Obesity on Clinical Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg. 2017; 110:e438-e449. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.010. View

Park D, Olson T, Upfill-Brown A, Adejuyigbe B, Shah A, Sheppard W . Biportal Endoscopic Approach for Lumbar Degenerative Disease in the Ambulatory Outpatient vs Inpatient Setting: A Comparative Study. Int J Spine Surg. 2023; 17(6):858-865. PMC: 10753325. DOI: 10.14444/8545. View

Heo D, Kim J, Park C, Quillo-Olvera J, Park C . Contralateral Sublaminar Endoscopic Approach for Removal of Lumbar Juxtafacet Cysts Using Percutaneous Biportal Endoscopic Surgery: Technical Report and Preliminary Results. World Neurosurg. 2018; 122:474-479. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.11.072. View

Upfill-Brown A, Olson T, Adejuyigbe B, Shah A, Sheppard W, Park C . Does the use of tranexamic acid intraoperatively reduce postoperative blood loss and complications following biportal endoscopic lumbosacral decompression?. J Spine Surg. 2024; 10(1):68-79. PMC: 10982914. DOI: 10.21037/jss-23-129. View

Bergquist J, Greil M, Khalsa S, Sun Y, Kashlan O, Hofstetter C . Full-endoscopic technique mitigates obesity-related perioperative morbidity of minimally invasive lumbar decompression. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(8):2748-2754. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07705-5. View

Eum J, Heo D, Son S, Park C . Percutaneous biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a technical note and preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 24(4):602-7. DOI: 10.3171/2015.7.SPINE15304. View

Barber S, Nakhla J, Konakondla S, Fridley J, Oyelese A, Ziya L Gokaslan . Outcomes of endoscopic discectomy compared with open microdiscectomy and tubular microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniations: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 31(6):802-815. DOI: 10.3171/2019.6.SPINE19532. View

10.

Copay A, Glassman S, Subach B, Berven S, Schuler T, Carreon L . Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J. 2008; 8(6):968-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.11.006. View

11.

Choi J, Park H, Park S, You K, Kang M, Hwang J . Biportal endoscopic discectomy versus tubular microscopic discectomy for treating single-level lumbar disc herniation in obese patients: a multicenter, retrospective analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023; 165(9):2641-2650. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05686-4. View

11.

Li W, Li H, Wang H, Wang S . Ultrasound-guided preoperative localization of radial nerve in the treatment of extra-articular distal humeral shaft fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1):1. PMC: 8725401. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04954-7. View

12.

Park D, Upfill-Brown A, Curtin N, Hamad C, Shah A, Kwon B . Clinical outcomes and complications after biportal endoscopic spine surgery: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 3673 cases. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(8):2637-2646. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07701-9. View

13.

Carroll A, Dowlati E, Molina E, Zhao D, Altshuler M, Mueller K . Does minimally invasive spine surgery improve outcomes in the obese population? A retrospective review of 1442 degenerative lumbar spine surgeries. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021; 35(4):460-470. DOI: 10.3171/2021.1.SPINE201785. View

14.

Cao J, Kong L, Meng F, Zhang Y, Shen Y . Impact of obesity on lumbar spinal surgery outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2016; 28:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.10.034. View

15.

Kranjac A, Kranjac D . Explaining adult obesity, severe obesity, and BMI: Five decades of change. Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e16210. PMC: 10213181. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16210. View

16.

Choi K, Shim H, Kim J, Cha K, Lee D, Kim E . Cost-effectiveness of microdiscectomy versus endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Spine J. 2019; 19(7):1162-1169. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.02.003. View

17.

Han T, Schouten J, Lean M, Seidell J . The prevalence of low back pain and associations with body fatness, fat distribution and height. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1997; 21(7):600-7. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800448. View

18.

Liu X, Yuan S, Tian Y, Wang L, Gong L, Zheng Y . Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018; 28(3):317-325. DOI: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. View

19.

Kim J, Choi D, Park E . Evaluation of Postoperative Spinal Epidural Hematoma After Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery for Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. World Neurosurg. 2019; 126:e786-e792. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.150. View