» Articles » PMID: 38829411

Prediction of Recurrent Heart Failure Hospitalizations and Mortality Using the Echocardiographic Killip Score

Overview
Date 2024 Jun 3
PMID 38829411
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Examine the performance of a simple echocardiographic "Killip score" (eKillip) in predicting heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and mortality after index event of decompensated HF hospitalization.

Methods: HF patients hospitalized at our facility between 03/2019-03/2021 who underwent an echocardiography during their index admission were included in this retrospective analysis. The cohort was divided into 4 classes of eKillip according to: stroke volume index (SVI) < 35ml/m > and E/E' ratio < 15 > . An eKillip Class I was defined as SVI ≥ 35ml/m and E/E' ≤ 15 and was used as reference.

Results: Included 751 patients, median age 78.1 (IQR 69.3-86) years, 59% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 45 (IQR 30-60)%, brain natriuretic peptide levels 634 (IQR 331-1222)pg/ml. Compared with eKillip Class I, a graded increase in the combined endpoint of 30-day mortality and rehospitalizations rates was noted: (Class II: HR 1.77, CI 0.95-3.33, p = 0.07; Class III: HR 1.94, CI 1.05-3.6, p = 0.034; Class IV: HR 2.9, CI 1.64-5.13, p < 0.001 respectively), which overall persisted after correction for clinical (Class II: HR 1.682, CI 0.9-3.15, p = 0.105; Class III: HR 2.104, CI 1.13-3.9, p = 0.019; Class IV: HR 2.74, CI 1.54-4.85, p = 0.001 respectively) or echocardiographic parameters (Class II: HR 1.92, CI 1.02-3.63, p = 0.045; Class III: HR 1.54, CI 0.81-2.95, p = 0.189; Class IV: HR 2.04, CI 1.1-3.76, p = 0.023 respectively). Specifically, the eKillip Class IV group comprised one-third of the patient population and persistently showed increased risk of 30-day HF hospitalizations or mortality following multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: A simple echocardiographic score can assist identifying high-risk decompensated HF patients for recurrent hospitalizations and mortality.

References
1.
Osenenko K, Kuti E, Deighton A, Pimple P, Szabo S . Burden of hospitalization for heart failure in the United States: a systematic literature review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022; 28(2):157-167. PMC: 10373049. DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.2.157. View

2.
KILLIP 3rd T, KIMBALL J . Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit. A two year experience with 250 patients. Am J Cardiol. 1967; 20(4):457-64. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(67)90023-9. View

3.
El-Menyar A, Zubaid M, Almahmeed W, Sulaiman K, Alnabti A, Singh R . Killip classification in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insight from a multicenter registry. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 30(1):97-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.10.011. View

4.
Khot U, Jia G, Moliterno D, Lincoff A, Khot M, Harrington R . Prognostic importance of physical examination for heart failure in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the enduring value of Killip classification. JAMA. 2003; 290(16):2174-81. DOI: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2174. View

5.
Launbjerg J, Berning J, Fruergaard P, Eliasen P, Borch-Johnsen K, Eiken P . Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by means of echocardiographic wall motion scoring and Killip classification. Cardiology. 1992; 80(5-6):375-81. DOI: 10.1159/000175028. View