» Articles » PMID: 38827656

A Field Guide for Teaching Evolution in the Social Sciences

Overview
Journal Evol Hum Behav
Specialty Psychology
Date 2024 Jun 3
PMID 38827656
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The theory of evolution by natural selection has begun to revolutionize our understanding of perception, cognition, language, social behavior, and cultural practices. Despite the centrality of evolutionary theory to the social sciences, many students, teachers, and even scientists struggle to understand how natural selection works. Our goal is to provide a field guide for social scientists on teaching evolution, based on research in cognitive psychology, developmental psychology, and education. We synthesize what is known about the psychological obstacles to understanding evolution, methods for assessing evolution understanding, and pedagogical strategies for improving evolution understanding. We review what is known about teaching evolution about nonhuman species and then explore implications of these findings for the teaching of evolution about humans. By leveraging our knowledge of how to teach evolution in general, we hope to motivate and equip social scientists to begin teaching evolution in the context of their own field.

Citing Articles

Genesis or Evolution of Gender Differences? Worldview-Based Dilemmas in The Processing of Scientific Information.

Lewandowsky S, Woike J, Oberauer K J Cogn. 2020; 3(1):9.

PMID: 32377619 PMC: 7193756. DOI: 10.5334/joc.99.

References
1.
Shtulman A, Harrington K . Tensions Between Science and Intuition Across the Lifespan. Top Cogn Sci. 2015; 8(1):118-37. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12174. View

2.
Chi M . Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Top Cogn Sci. 2014; 1(1):73-105. DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x. View

3.
Bolhuis J, Brown G, Richardson R, Laland K . Darwin in mind: new opportunities for evolutionary psychology. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9(7):e1001109. PMC: 3139638. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001109. View

4.
Shtulman A, Schulz L . The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cogn Sci. 2011; 32(6):1049-62. DOI: 10.1080/03640210801897864. View

5.
Opfer J, Gelman S . Children's and adults' models for predicting teleological action: the development of a biology-based model. Child Dev. 2001; 72(5):1367-81. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00353. View