» Articles » PMID: 38826498

Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score Predicts Hepatic Decompensation and Mortality

Overview
Journal JHEP Rep
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Jun 3
PMID 38826498
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background & Aims: In community pathways for detection of liver disease the most common reason for referral is fibrosis assessment. We investigated the impact of adding the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score as a second-line test (subsequent to an indeterminate or high Fibrosis-4 index [FIB-4] and/or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score) to guide referral and prognostication in our multi-aetiology pathway.

Methods: Patients with ELF results from the intelligent Liver Function Testing (iLFT) pathway were recruited. Case note review was undertaken to compare ELF with endpoints of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and mortality (liver-related and all-cause death).

Results: In total, 1,327 individuals were included with a median follow-up of 859 days and median ELF score of 10.2. Overall sensitivity for cirrhosis at the 9.8 threshold was 94% (100% for metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease, 89% for alcohol-related liver disease). Determination of the ELF score as a second-line test reduced the referral rate by 34%. ELF scores predicted hepatic outcomes; each unit change was associated with increased decompensation (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 2.215, 95% CI: 1.934-2.537) and liver-related mortality (aHR 2.024, 95% CI: 1.674-2.446). ELF outperformed FIB-4 for risk of liver-related mortality, particularly in the short-term (area under the curve [AUC] 94.3% 82.8% at six months). Where FIB-4 was indeterminate, ELF had higher AUC for all outcomes within at least 2 years. ELF ≥13 was associated with particularly high rates of decompensation (26% within 90 days) and all-cause mortality (38% at 1 year).

Conclusions: The addition of ELF reduced the number of individuals referred for fibrosis assessment following iLFT pathway testing and provided useful prognostic information. Individuals with ELF scores ≥13 were considered at high-risk of negative outcomes warranting urgent clinical assessment.

Impact And Implications: Primary care pathways for suspected liver disease are increasingly common and often lead to increased specialist hepatology referrals for fibrosis assessment. This study, using clinical follow-up for liver-related outcomes, provides further evidence supporting ELF testing to safely reduce referrals in a two-step approach when combined with other simple fibrosis markers. Additionally, ELF scores predict liver-related morbidity and mortality, with ELF scores ≥13 indicating particularly high-risk patients. This study may help inform the implementation of diagnostic pathways for early detection of liver disease and highlights the need for urgent review of individuals with very high ELF scores.

Citing Articles

Preventing the progression of cirrhosis to decompensation and death.

Villanueva C, Tripathi D, Bosch J Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025; .

PMID: 39870944 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-01031-x.


Use of Non-Invasive Biomarkers and Clinical Scores to Predict the Complications of Liver Cirrhosis: A Bicentric Experience.

Scarlata G, Ismaiel A, Gambardella M, Leucuta D, Luzza F, Dumitrascu D Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(11).

PMID: 39597039 PMC: 11596259. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111854.


Recent developments in non-invasive methods for assessing metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease.

Singh A, Sohal A, Batta A World J Gastroenterol. 2024; 30(39):4324-4328.

PMID: 39492822 PMC: 11525852. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i39.4324.


Disease modifiers and novel markers in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Mak L J Liver Cancer. 2024; 24(2):145-154.

PMID: 39099070 PMC: 11449577. DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2024.08.03.


Intelligent Liver Function Testing (iLFT): An Intelligent Laboratory Approach to Identifying Chronic Liver Disease.

Nobes J, Leith D, Handjiev S, Dillon J, Dow E Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 38732374 PMC: 11083526. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090960.

References
1.
Patel P, Connoley D, Rhodes F, Srivastava A, Rosenberg W . A review of the clinical utility of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test in multiple aetiologies of chronic liver disease. Ann Clin Biochem. 2019; 57(1):36-43. DOI: 10.1177/0004563219879962. View

2.
Simbrunner B, Marculescu R, Scheiner B, Schwabl P, Bucsics T, Stadlmann A . Non-invasive detection of portal hypertension by enhanced liver fibrosis score in patients with different aetiologies of advanced chronic liver disease. Liver Int. 2020; 40(7):1713-1724. PMC: 7383870. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14498. View

3.
MacPherson I, Nobes J, Dow E, Furrie E, Miller M, Robinson E . Intelligent Liver Function Testing: Working Smarter to Improve Patient Outcomes in Liver Disease. J Appl Lab Med. 2020; 5(5):1090-1100. DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa109. View

4.
Gressner O, Weiskirchen R, Gressner A . Biomarkers of liver fibrosis: clinical translation of molecular pathogenesis or based on liver-dependent malfunction tests. Clin Chim Acta. 2007; 381(2):107-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.02.038. View

5.
Williams R, Aspinall R, Bellis M, Camps-Walsh G, Cramp M, Dhawan A . Addressing liver disease in the UK: a blueprint for attaining excellence in health care and reducing premature mortality from lifestyle issues of excess consumption of alcohol, obesity, and viral hepatitis. Lancet. 2014; 384(9958):1953-97. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61838-9. View