SARS-CoV-2 3CLPro Dihedral Angles Reveal Allosteric Signaling

Overview

Journal bioRxiv

Date 2024 Jun 3

PMID 38826232

Authors

Daniel Evans

Samreen Sheraz

Albert Lau

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In allosteric proteins, identifying the pathways that signals take from allosteric ligand-binding sites to enzyme active sites or binding pockets and interfaces remains challenging. This avenue of research is motivated by the goals of understanding particular macromolecular systems of interest and creating general methods for their study. An especially important protein that is the subject of many investigations in allostery is the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro), which is necessary for coronaviral replication. It is both an attractive drug target and, due to intense interest in it for the development of pharmaceutical compounds, a gauge of the state-of-the-art approaches in studying protein inhibition. Here we develop a computational method for characterizing protein allostery and use it to study Mpro. We propose a role of the protein's C-terminal tail in allosteric modulation and warn of unintuitive traps that can plague studies of the role of protein dihedrals angles in transmitting allosteric signals.

References

Bhattacharya S, Vaidehi N . Differences in allosteric communication pipelines in the inactive and active states of a GPCR. Biophys J. 2014; 107(2):422-434. PMC: 4104064. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.015. View

Sztain T, Amaro R, McCammon J . Elucidation of Cryptic and Allosteric Pockets within the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. J Chem Inf Model. 2021; 61(7):3495-3501. PMC: 8117783. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00140. View

Dasgupta D, Chan W, Carlson H . Computational Identification of Possible Allosteric Sites and Modulators of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease. J Chem Inf Model. 2022; 62(3):618-626. PMC: 10262278. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01223. View

Wodak S, Paci E, Dokholyan N, Berezovsky I, Horovitz A, Li J . Allostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications. Structure. 2019; 27(4):566-578. PMC: 6688844. DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2019.01.003. View

Laurent B, Chavent M, Cragnolini T, Dahl A, Pasquali S, Derreumaux P . Epock: rapid analysis of protein pocket dynamics. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(9):1478-80. PMC: 4410650. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu822. View

El-Baba T, Lutomski C, Kantsadi A, Malla T, John T, Mikhailov V . Allosteric Inhibition of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease: Insights from Mass Spectrometry Based Assays*. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020; 59(52):23544-23548. PMC: 7461284. DOI: 10.1002/anie.202010316. View

Singh S, Bowman G . Quantifying Allosteric Communication via Both Concerted Structural Changes and Conformational Disorder with CARDS. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017; 13(4):1509-1517. PMC: 5934993. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01181. View

Beglov D, Hall D, Wakefield A, Luo L, Allen K, Kozakov D . Exploring the structural origins of cryptic sites on proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(15):E3416-E3425. PMC: 5899430. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1711490115. View

MONOD J, Wyman J, Changeux J . ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. J Mol Biol. 1965; 12:88-118. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(65)80285-6. View

10.

Theobald D . Rapid calculation of RMSDs using a quaternion-based characteristic polynomial. Acta Crystallogr A. 2005; 61(Pt 4):478-80. DOI: 10.1107/S0108767305015266. View

11.

Ansari N, Rizzi V, Carloni P, Parrinello M . Water-Triggered, Irreversible Conformational Change of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease on Passing from the Solid State to Aqueous Solution. J Am Chem Soc. 2021; 143(33):12930-12934. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c05301. View

12.

Wu S, Lee C, Pedersen L . Analysis on long-range residue-residue communication using molecular dynamics. Proteins. 2014; 82(11):2896-2901. PMC: 4206573. DOI: 10.1002/prot.24629. View

13.

Nussinov R, Tsai C . Allostery without a conformational change? Revisiting the paradigm. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014; 30:17-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.11.005. View

14.

Michaud-Agrawal N, Denning E, Woolf T, Beckstein O . MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Chem. 2011; 32(10):2319-27. PMC: 3144279. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21787. View

15.

Wagner J, Sorensen J, Hensley N, Wong C, Zhu C, Perison T . POVME 3.0: Software for Mapping Binding Pocket Flexibility. J Chem Theory Comput. 2017; 13(9):4584-4592. PMC: 5751414. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00500. View

16.

Komatsu T, Okimoto N, Koyama Y, Hirano Y, Morimoto G, Ohno Y . Drug binding dynamics of the dimeric SARS-CoV-2 main protease, determined by molecular dynamics simulation. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):16986. PMC: 7550358. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74099-5. View

17.

Campitelli P, Lu J, Ozkan S . Dynamic allostery highlights the evolutionary differences between the CoV-1 and CoV-2 main proteases. Biophys J. 2022; 121(8):1483-1492. PMC: 8920573. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.03.012. View

18.

Hofmann H . All over or overall - Do we understand allostery?. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2023; 83:102724. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102724. View

19.

Cho E, Rosa M, Anjum R, Mehmood S, Soban M, Mujtaba M . Dynamic Profiling of β-Coronavirus 3CL M Protease Ligand-Binding Sites. J Chem Inf Model. 2021; 61(6):3058-3073. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00449. View

20.

Dubanevics I, McLeish T . Computational analysis of dynamic allostery and control in the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. J R Soc Interface. 2021; 18(174):20200591. PMC: 7879766. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0591. View