» Articles » PMID: 38826005

"Mild", "Moderate", or "Severe" Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? Depends on Who You Ask: Analysis of Existing Classification Systems in 665 Hands

Overview
Date 2024 Jun 3
PMID 38826005
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy in the body and impacts approximately 5% of the U.S. population costing nearly $5 billion/year. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is considered the gold standard for CTS diagnosis. Classification systems exist that categorize CTS severity based on EDX findings. This investigation evaluated EDX findings across consecutive CTS severity categories within existing classification systems and classifications.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 665 hands from 468 patients undergoing EDX testing for suspected CTS. Complete classification systems and classifications were evaluated for discrimination capability across consecutive CTS severity categories based on EDX findings. Additional analysis evaluated the relationship of sex and age factors and CTS severity.

Results: classifications demonstrated superior discrimination capability between consecutive CTS severity categories regardless of classification system used. Demographic factors significantly influenced EDX findings and categorization of CTS severity.

Conclusions: This study underscores the value of classifications for enhancing discrimination between consecutive CTS severity categories based on EDX findings. Demographic factors should be considered when interpreting EDX findings for the purpose of categorizing CTS severity. Future research should refine existing classification systems and explore additional factors influencing CTS severity used to inform medical management.

Citing Articles

Values and Diagnostic Accuracy of Electrodiagnostic Findings in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Based on Age, Gender, and Diabetes.

Abuzinadah A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(13).

PMID: 39001271 PMC: 11240809. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131381.

References
1.
Padua L, Lomonaco M, Gregori B, Valente E, Padua R, Tonali P . Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand. 1997; 96(4):211-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1997.tb00271.x. View

2.
Greathouse D, Ernst G, Halle J, Shaffer S . GEHS Neurophysiological Classification System for Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. US Army Med Dep J. 2016; :60-7. View

3.
Bland J . A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2000; 23(8):1280-3. DOI: 10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:8<1280::aid-mus20>3.0.co;2-y. View

4.
Chang C, Lee W, Liao Y, Chang M . Which nerve conduction parameters can predict spontaneous electromyographic activity in carpal tunnel syndrome?. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013; 124(11):2264-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.04.338. View

5.
Werner R . Electrodiagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathies. PM R. 2013; 5(5 Suppl):S14-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.03.027. View