» Articles » PMID: 38822111

The Impact of Hypovolemia and PEEP on Recirculation in Venovenous ECMO: an Experimental Porcine Model

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 May 31
PMID 38822111
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recirculation is a common problem in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and may limit the effect of ECMO treatment due to less efficient blood oxygenation or unfavorable ECMO and ventilator settings. The impact of hypovolemia and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on recirculation is unclear and poorly described in guidelines, despite clinical importance. The aim of this study was to investigate how hypovolemia, autotransfusion and PEEP affect recirculation in comparison to ECMO cannula distance and circuit flow.

Methods: In anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs (n = 6) on VV ECMO, we measured recirculation fraction (RF), changes in recirculation fraction (∆RF), hemodynamics and ECMO circuit pressures during alterations in PEEP (5 cmHO vs 15 cmHO), ECMO flow (3.5 L/min vs 5.0 L/min), cannula distance (10-14 cm vs 20-26 cm intravascular distance), hypovolemia (1000 mL blood loss) and autotransfusion (1000 mL blood transfusion).

Results: Recirculation increased during hypovolemia (median ∆RF 43%), high PEEP (∆RF 28% and 12% with long and short cannula distance, respectively), high ECMO flow (∆RF 49% and 28% with long and short cannula distance, respectively) and with short cannula distance (∆RF 16%). Recirculation decreased after autotransfusion (∆RF - 45%).

Conclusions: In the present animal study, hypovolemia, PEEP and autotransfusion were important determinants of recirculation. The alterations were comparable to other well-known factors, such as ECMO circuit flow and intravascular cannula distance. Interestingly, hypovolemia increased recirculation without significant change in ECMO drainage pressure, whereas high PEEP increased recirculation with less negative ECMO drainage pressure. Autotransfusion decreased recirculation. The findings are interesting for clinical studies.

References
1.
Fisser C, Palmer O, Sallisalmi M, Paulus M, Foltan M, Philipp A . Recirculation in single lumen cannula venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A non-randomized bi-centric trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:973240. PMC: 9470851. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.973240. View

2.
Andersson Lindholm J . Cannulation for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(Suppl 5):S606-S612. PMC: 5911563. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.101. View

3.
Montisci A, Maj G, Zangrillo A, Winterton D, Pappalardo F . Management of refractory hypoxemia during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ARDS. ASAIO J. 2015; 61(3):227-36. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000207. View

4.
Xie A, Yan T, Forrest P . Recirculation in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Crit Care. 2016; 36:107-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.05.027. View

5.
Schmidt M, Bailey M, Kelly J, Hodgson C, Cooper D, Scheinkestel C . Impact of fluid balance on outcome of adult patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40(9):1256-66. PMC: 7094895. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-014-3360-2. View