Genetic Association of Serum Lipids and Lipid-modifying Targets with Endometriosis: Trans-ethnic Mendelian-randomization and Mediation Analysis

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2024 May 31

PMID 38820493

Authors

Hongling Zhang

Yawei Fan

Huijun Li

Xiaoqing Feng

Daoyuan Yue

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Prior observational research identified dyslipidemia as a risk factor for endometriosis (EMS) but the causal relationship remains unestablished due to inherent study limitations.

Methods: Genome-wide association study data for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol (TC) from European (EUR) and East Asian (EAS) ancestries were sourced from the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium. Multi-ancestry EMS data came from various datasets. Univariable Mendelian randomization (MR) examined causal links between serum lipids and EMS. Multivariable and mediation MR explored the influence of seven confounding factors and mediators. Drug-target MR investigates the association between lipid-lowering target genes identified in positive results and EMS. The primary method was inverse-variance weighted (IVW), with replication datasets and meta-analyses reinforcing causal associations. Sensitivity analyses included false discovery rate (FDR) correction, causal analysis using summary effect estimates (CAUSE), and colocalization analysis.

Results: IVW analysis in EUR ancestry showed a significant causal association between TG and increased EMS risk (OR = 1.112, 95% CI 1.033-1.198, P = 5.03×10-3, PFDR = 0.03), supported by replication and meta-analyses. CAUSE analysis confirmed unbiased results (P < 0.05). Multivariable and mediation MR revealed that systolic blood pressure (Mediation effect: 7.52%, P = 0.02) and total testosterone (Mediation effect: 10.79%, P = 0.01) partly mediated this relationship. No causal links were found between other lipid traits and EMS (P > 0.05 & PFDR > 0.05). In EAS ancestry, no causal relationships with EMS were detected (P > 0.05 & PFDR > 0.05). Drug-target MR indicated suggestive evidence for the influence of ANGPTL3 on EMS mediated through TG (OR = 0.798, 95% CI 0.670-0.951, P = 0.01, PFDR = 0.04, PP.H4 = 0.85%).

Conclusions: This MR study in EUR ancestry indicated an increased EMS risk with higher serum TG levels.

Citing Articles

Association between remnant cholesterol (RC) and endometriosis: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES data.

Chen Z, Li R, Guo J, Ye X, Zhou Y, Cao M Lipids Health Dis. 2025; 24(1):2.

PMID: 39754185 PMC: 11699680. DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02422-4.

The breadth and impact of the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium.

Dron J, Natarajan P, Peloso G Curr Opin Lipidol. 2024; .

PMID: 39602359 PMC: 11888832. DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000966.

References

Geladari E, Tsamadia P, Vallianou N . ANGPTL3 Inhibitors　- Their Role in Cardiovascular Disease Through Regulation of Lipid Metabolism. Circ J. 2018; 83(2):267-273. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-18-0442. View

Hemani G, Zheng J, Elsworth B, Wade K, Haberland V, Baird D . The MR-Base platform supports systematic causal inference across the human phenome. Elife. 2018; 7. PMC: 5976434. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.34408. View

Tin A, Kottgen A . Mendelian Randomization Analysis as a Tool to Gain Insights into Causes of Diseases: A Primer. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021; 32(10):2400-2407. PMC: 8722812. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020121760. View

Sakaue S, Kanai M, Tanigawa Y, Karjalainen J, Kurki M, Koshiba S . A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes. Nat Genet. 2021; 53(10):1415-1424. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-021-00931-x. View

Miller M, Cannon C, Murphy S, Qin J, Ray K, Braunwald E . Impact of triglyceride levels beyond low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after acute coronary syndrome in the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 51(7):724-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.038. View

Morgan H, Furse S, Dias I, Shabir K, Castellanos M, Khan I . Paternal low protein diet perturbs inter-generational metabolic homeostasis in a tissue-specific manner in mice. Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):929. PMC: 9458637. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03914-8. View

Wang Y, Nicholes K, Shih I . The Origin and Pathogenesis of Endometriosis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2019; 15:71-95. PMC: 7980953. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032654. View

Bowden J, Davey Smith G, Haycock P, Burgess S . Consistent Estimation in Mendelian Randomization with Some Invalid Instruments Using a Weighted Median Estimator. Genet Epidemiol. 2016; 40(4):304-14. PMC: 4849733. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21965. View

Sharifi-Rad M, Anil Kumar N, Zucca P, Varoni E, Dini L, Panzarini E . Lifestyle, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants: Back and Forth in the Pathophysiology of Chronic Diseases. Front Physiol. 2020; 11:694. PMC: 7347016. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00694. View

10.

Mu F, Rich-Edwards J, Rimm E, Spiegelman D, Forman J, Missmer S . Association Between Endometriosis and Hypercholesterolemia or Hypertension. Hypertension. 2017; 70(1):59-65. PMC: 6469492. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09056. View

11.

Davies N, Holmes M, Davey Smith G . Reading Mendelian randomisation studies: a guide, glossary, and checklist for clinicians. BMJ. 2018; 362:k601. PMC: 6041728. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k601. View

12.

Nahar K, Khanam N, Chowdhury A, Khan N, Mohamed Z . Association of Dyslipidemia with Endometriosis: A Case Control Study. Mymensingh Med J. 2023; 32(1):118-124. View

13.

Burgess S, Thompson S . Interpreting findings from Mendelian randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017; 32(5):377-389. PMC: 5506233. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-017-0255-x. View

14.

Zheng R, Du X, Lei Y . Correlations between endometriosis, lipid profile, and estrogen levels. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023; 102(29):e34348. PMC: 10662880. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034348. View

15.

Maia L, Rocha A, Del Puerto H, Petraglia F, Reis F . Plasma urocortin-1 as a preoperative marker of endometriosis in symptomatic women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2017; 34(3):202-205. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1380188. View

16.

Zhang L, Mukherjee B, Ghosh M, Gruber S, Moreno V . Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction. Stat Med. 2007; 27(15):2756-83. DOI: 10.1002/sim.3044. View

17.

Marchini T, Magnani N, Paz M, Vanasco V, Tasat D, Gonzalez Maglio D . Time course of systemic oxidative stress and inflammatory response induced by an acute exposure to Residual Oil Fly Ash. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2013; 274(2):274-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.11.013. View

18.

Yengo L, Sidorenko J, Kemper K, Zheng Z, Wood A, Weedon M . Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for height and body mass index in ∼700000 individuals of European ancestry. Hum Mol Genet. 2018; 27(20):3641-3649. PMC: 6488973. DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddy271. View

19.

Cheng H, Garrick D, Fernando R . Efficient strategies for leave-one-out cross validation for genomic best linear unbiased prediction. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017; 8:38. PMC: 5414316. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-017-0164-6. View

20.

Nagai A, Hirata M, Kamatani Y, Muto K, Matsuda K, Kiyohara Y . Overview of the BioBank Japan Project: Study design and profile. J Epidemiol. 2017; 27(3S):S2-S8. PMC: 5350590. DOI: 10.1016/j.je.2016.12.005. View