» Articles » PMID: 38819198

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on Anorectal Function Assessed with Anorectal Manometry: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Tumori
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 May 31
PMID 38819198
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: Improvement in oncological survival for rectal cancer increases attention to anorectal dysfunction. Diagnostic questionnaires can evaluate quality of life but are subjective and dependent on patients' compliance. Anorectal manometry can objectively assess the continence mechanism and identify functional sphincter weakness and rectal compliance. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is presumed to affect anorectal function. We aim to assess anorectal function in rectal cancer patients who undergo total mesorectal excision, with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiation, using anorectal manometry measurements.

Method: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies comparing perioperative anorectal manometry between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery for rectal cancers. Primary outcomes were resting pressure, squeeze pressure, sensory threshold volume and maximal tolerable volume.

Results: Eight studies were included in the systematic review, of which seven were included for metanalysis. 155 patients (45.3%) had neoadjuvant chemoradiation before definitive surgery, and 187 (54.6%) underwent upfront surgery. Most patients were male (238 vs. 118). The standardized mean difference of mean resting pressure, mean and maximum squeeze pressure, maximum resting pressure, sensory threshold volume, and maximal tolerable volume favored the upfront surgery group but without statistical significance.

Conclusion: Currently available evidence on anorectal manometry protocols failed to show any statistically significant differences in functional outcomes between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and upfront surgery. Further large-scale prospective studies with standardized neoadjuvant chemoradiation and anorectal manometry protocols are needed to validate these findings.

References
1.
Temple L, Bacik J, Savatta S, Gottesman L, Paty P, Weiser M . The development of a validated instrument to evaluate bowel function after sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48(7):1353-65. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0942-z. View

2.
Pescatori M, Anastasio G, Bottini C, Mentasti A . New grading and scoring for anal incontinence. Evaluation of 335 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992; 35(5):482-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF02049407. View

3.
Uzcudun A, Batlle J, Velasco J, Sanchez Santos M, de Castro Carpeno J, Grande A . Efficacy of preoperative radiation therapy for resectable rectal adenocarcinoma when combined with oral tegafur-uracil modulated with leucovorin: results from a phase II study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45(10):1349-58. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6424-5. View

4.
Dulskas A, Samalavicius N . Usefulness of Anorectal Manometry for Diagnosing Continence Problems After a Low Anterior Resection. Ann Coloproctol. 2016; 32(3):101-4. PMC: 4942524. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2016.32.3.101. View

5.
van Duijvendijk P, Slors J, Taat C, van Tets W, van Tienhoven G, Obertop H . Prospective evaluation of anorectal function after total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma with or without preoperative radiotherapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002; 97(9):2282-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05782.x. View